Met a girl while being an English teacher in China. She was originally from New York. She had a very distinctive voice, very hard to forget.
Fast forward 10 years. I'm at the Santa Monica Pier playing Pokemon Go with my brother. Suddenly, THAT VOICE. I'm like... No... That isn't possible. I keep on walking.
We reach the end of the pier, and turn around. And BOOM. There she is. We make eye contact, and are both like wtffff.
Turns out she moved there to do a podcast or something.
Anyway cool shit
Incredible work. This is indeed buried treasure.
When people say things like this, I wonder if they understand how impossible it is. Google is not just a company. It is a 2 trillion dollar entity. Even if Google search entirely fails, it will still persist. At this point, you may as well say, "The wind needs to be ended." You don't end the wind. The wind already won. It will outlive you, me, and our children.
What we can do is protect against it. We can deal with it. We can contain it. We can redirect it and repurpose it to be helpful. But ending it? That doesn't happen.
Give the dude his cupcake recipe yo
Is China's reduction in birth rate caused by the same thing? Or Germany's? I'm just saying, this seems to be a phenomenon of wealth and prosperity, not any specific coordinated effort.
As for multiculturalism... My opinion there is it's all relative. Technically the land belongs to the native Americans. Europeans are the new culture.
Interestingly, the majority of Canada's new incoming non permanent immigrants appear to be from Ukrainian, another European country, to escape the war.
If I understand you correctly, are you saying that there was some coordinated effort to lower birth rates over the last 40 years? What would the point of this be?
According to most sociologists, the lowering birth rate seems to be an effect of higher incomes and education, and is affecting most first world countries, not just Canada.
I think I agree with you, however, that wages in general should go up at the expense of the super-wealthy elites.
According to this: https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-levels-plans.html
The idea is to ensure economic prosperity of the future. Extremely low birth rates + an aging population = a need for more immigration. The US, Japan, and Korea will all need to do this soon too - social security is set to run out in 2035 if we don't do anything about it. Immigration is the answer.
Yeah its weird, we are kinda both right. I did some more research, and... its admittedly quite confusing. According to this article 2,198,679 is correct for 2023 as the total number of non-permanent residents in Canada, which is over 1 million more than the year before. But! This 1 million excess isn't all new people. They revised the way they counted people, which resulted in a higher number than before being counted.
The article goes on to say "The large growth from international migration is due to nearly 470,000 new permanent resident landings, and an increase in the number of non-permanent residents by almost 700,000 people."
So the number in my previous comment was only accounting for "NEW and permanent" residents, not the non-permanent residents. The number of "NEW non-permanent" residents is not given, but it is implied that most of their increased number come from the new method of counting them.
As a side note, of the 2.2 million non permanent residents in Canada, 1.4 million of them have work permits, and a lot have student visas (the exact number wasn't shown in the article).
Regardless, it is true that the number of new immigrants is increasing faster than any other G7 country. Is that a bad thing? Find out next time on Dragon Ball Z
Ah, the comment you replied was talking about the US. I think that is where the confusion came in.
Edit -
The number of immigrants into canada according to statista:
2022 - 2023: 468,817
2021 - 2022: 493,236
That is a lot, but not 2.5 million
Wait, I don't get it. Are you implying you believe that the population of the US is only 37.5 million?
Honestly people like that guy are idiots. There could be all the evidence in the world, but if one nut job blog post agrees with them they say aha! I found the evidence!
The people here who 1) think a breakup of Google will actually happen, and 2) think that a paid subscription model for a search engine have all been spending too much time in their Linux bubble.
If Google did this, everyone would just switch to Bing, or open AI's new thing they are making. The general public will not be on board with that.