this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
873 points (98.3% liked)

News

22841 readers
3654 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It turns out that more technology in cars isn’t necessarily something customers want, and it’s not really improving their driving experience. We know my thoughts on the matter, but I’ll do my best to stay impartial on this latest survey from JD Power that shows most customers don’t appreciate technology in cars unless they can see a clear benefit to them.

JD Power’s 2024 U.S. Tech Experience Index Study evaluated over 81,000 drivers’ experience with “advanced vehicle technologies” in 2024 model year vehicles after 90 days of ownership, It turned out to be a pretty mixed bag when it came to what people liked using. There are a number of tech features that customers like using because they feels that it answers their needs, but at the same time there is a whole lot that don’t get used very often or are continually annoying, according to the survey.

...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 200 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (27 children)

I'm ok with a decent amount of tech in a car. Like I'm fine being able to connect my phone to the car and have android auto take over the infotainment system.

But the HVAC stuff needs to be buttons I can access/control without looking or very minimal looking.

I don't want/need my car to have a SIM card, or connect to wifi, and report what I'm doing. If they want to do that, then they can give me the car for free and I'll drive it around letting them collect my driving habits.

Edit: Oh, and I'm sure as hell not paying some subscription fee on top of the price of the car.

[–] odium@programming.dev 74 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Good news, lawmakers in the US finally started looking at this issue.

Bad news: probably will take years for change

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 35 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

There are numerous headlines like:

118th Congress on track to become one of the least productive in US history

So good luck with that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 109 points 2 weeks ago (23 children)

Peak technology enjoyment in a car includes

  • multiple zone ac
  • heated/ventilated seats
  • real buttons and not FUCKING CAPACITIVE TOUCH
  • android auto/apple car play
[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

There's some other minor tech that's fairly nice that I haven't seen in cheaper cars. Lights under the door to light up the ground on dark nights for when you're getting out. Just solid utilitarian tech right there.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

I've been driving spoiled with Lane Keep Assist. I'd like to continue to keep that as a thing in all cars.

Also, I used a Ford Escape as a rental this weekend, and holy shit I hate having to wait for the startup animation to complete so I can finally mess with the A/C and have it going on full blast after sitting in the hot sun all day. My Santa Cruz has actual buttons for all the climate control stuff and I had no idea I'd miss it so much until now.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] tal 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'd rather just have a standard size bank up front, like, 3DIN, and choose my own "car computer". Have security locking support, guarantee certain power supply, impact, and temperature conditions. And then open up the "car console" market.

And let me be able to upgrade it five or ten years down the road.

If they want to provide a standard first-party center panel offering, fine. But computers and phones have a shorter life than do cars, and I don't want to be locked into ancient or badly-chosen controls and computers. This "car is a big cell phone" thing is just godawful from a consumer standpoint.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 79 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

We need some serious federal regulation against bullshit in vehicles.

Every function that is normal to use while in motion needs a physical button.

Absolutely no fucking spyware reporting back to the manufacturer.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

give me buttons and dials, not touch screens and ai. I want to drive, not check social media. I'll be keeping my 2009 until the engine locks up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 64 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep. I'm hoping my current car holds out until this 'smartphone on wheels" trend reverses.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

'smartphone on wheels'*

*Apple CarPlay and Android Auto not supported.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

All I need is Bluetooth in the audio system and a place to hang my phone. Beyond that, things that don't make my car move or my body comfortable can go to hell.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t hate tech in my car.

I hate unnecessary, poorly designed tech in my car.

Current tech design unnecessarily complicates and obscures what should be simple and easily accessible functions. That’s more than just irritating, it’s dangerous.

[–] CertifiedBlackGuy@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

BRING BACK THE FUCKING BUTTONS HOLY SHIT

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

As a driver, all I really want is good music, good navigation, and easy access to all my controls.

I don't want to have to go into submenus to change my temp settings, or open the trunk.

IMO, a vehicle should be a fairly simple tool to operate. All of the nuances with driving should be how you use those controls to get to where you're going. Even with the (frankly, impressive) self driving tech we currently have, I still don't think it's ready to replace a driver at the wheel; bluntly, that's the only tech I really want in a car.

Automatic options for fairly standard functions, such as turning on your headlights at night, shutting off the highbeams when there's oncoming vehicles, and even automatic windshield wipers, can make things easier. Which I appreciate. I can override all of these systems, which is good. The advent of climate controls rather than "how hot" and "how cold" you want your blower to be and at what speed, is also nice. Even driving assist, like automatic lane keeping and adaptive cruise control is a nice-to-have. But these are all augmentations of systems and they're pretty transparent to the driver. If you don't want to use them, you can easily ignore or override the systems and do it yourself.

What I don't appreciate is all the infotainment garbage. I can literally play games on the touch screen of my partners 2019 accord. I tried it out and bluntly, it's not comfortable, it only works when the car isn't moving, and I'm not going to sit in my car to play games. That's dumb. I kind of get it for EVs for when they're charging, but honestly, I can have a better experience on my phone/tablet.

I don't need weather, I don't need a touch screen, and I don't need whatever garbage GPS system you were paid to sell with the car.

Give me Android auto/some carplay, with maybe FM as a backup in case of emergency, and I'm good. My phone already has data, my car doesn't need LTE. Give me buttons to press for all climate and driving functions and I'm a happy person.

I don't want to navigate some menu to try to turn on my defogger. Fuck off.

Driving tech should be transparent to anyone who doesn't give a shit, and just wants to drive down the road.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Car companies don't care, they think the tech gives them an excuse to charge more even though a lot of the tech is actually cheaper (a single touch screen instead of all kinds of knobs and buttons) plus it's a way for them to collect more of your data to sell. Before buying my next vehicle, I want to make sure I can easily disable its internet functionality through hardware so that it doesn't phone home.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

No one hates the tech in their cars, ABS is universally loved. What people hate is tech working not in tandem but against them

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd argue that touchscreens in cars is pretty dumb for the most part. Detents and buttons are incredibly effective physical feedback systems that are being thrown away for them, sadly.

[–] EurekaStockade@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I still can't believe they're legal. Interacting with your phone while driving is against the law but for some reason when it's a part of your dashboard it's a-ok?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TerraNova@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 weeks ago

Data privacy is a concern of mine.

Car makers see technology as a data mining opportunity to force us to use their shitty infotainment systems to track our every move and interest, and then milk us with subscriptions.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I don't like tech in cars either.. I like EVs bit the thought of dealing with that center screen for everything is just lame. Another thing that sucks are the fobs.. Who asked for those? If I want to go swimming I now have to take apart a little plastic thing and stick it in my car

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not about the drivers, it's about cheaper costs and normalizing subscription services for your vehicle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Summary: Computerized touch screens and 'smart' features with poorly thought-out UI and UX are a solution in search of a problem.

Start with what directly benefits the user and driving experience.

Go from there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I drive an EV for work, any my biggest gripe is the touchscreen. What is wrong with buttons. Why must everything be hidden behind a menu I have to navigate on a touchscreen. It feels less safe, frankly. In my own car I have muscle memory for each button and can do things like skip songs or adjust the AC without looking away from the road... But in the EV I can't.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I wish my stereo system in my RX 450h were easily swappable. i haven't had a swappable stereo in a car since my 2005 suzuki wagon

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cmrn@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

While it would be nice to have a screen for music and nav, I absolutely hate any car where you NEED to use the screen to do things. It feels like distracted driving is designed into cars these days…

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AlbinoPython@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Copythis@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

I was helping my mom shop for a new car, and we discovered she needed the requirement of "physical AC controls".

Everything is all on the touch screen.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I like the tech in my car, it has knobs and buttons. But then again it is from '91.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 23 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

ITT: lemmy designing a car, like Homer Simpson.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Visited my parents while they were in Florida recently. Drove their rental car to the store, it was a newer model with "Lane Assist Technology." It was terrible. Tried to swerve around a pothole, and the steering wheel vibrated and steered me back into it. Same thing happened as I angled the car to enter a roundabout, the damn thing just steered against me! It felt like at any time the car might just "decide" to swerve me into oncoming traffic! I'll never buy a car with that trash masquerading as tech. Absolute garbage feature.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] sandalbucket@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

2014 impreza. No screen at all. I bought a phone mount that shows waze and charges my phone.

I have cruise control and heated seats. And I can operate both with gloves on!

Don’t need a backup cam because my windows and mirrors are good.

I will drive this car until it dies, and then I’ll replace the head gaskets and drive it until it dies again. And then I will replace the cvt and drive it until it dies a third time.

Unfortunately there’s nothing you can do about the NY road salt. The frame will be left, flake by flake, in the gutters of 490. It’s the only thing that can take this car from me, and it is its inevitable fate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] papabobolious@feddit.nu 22 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)

The only features I really want is ABS, Bluetooth and a physical interface. Everything else I would rather not pay for.

I live in Sweden so it's not like I need AC, I don't use cruise etc. and most other modern features mainly serve to annoy me.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Power windows, Bluetooth audio systems, seat warmers.

These are all really positive tech advancements in my lifetime.

Touch screen interfaces, power door handles (without a manual override), firmware disables features or limitations that are determined by the DLC you purchase from your dealership...

These are fucking bullshit and almost no one I know likes them.

It is insane how anti-consumer cars have gotten.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yup.

I refuse to buy any vehicle made after 2015, and even that's quite a bit newer than I'd like.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't mind having tech in my car, but I have a zero-tolerance policy for proprietary spyware-infested shit. Therefore, I can't buy any vehicle made after 2015.

I'd like to have a double-DIN car computer with a Raspberry Pi, RTL-SDR (for the radio) and OBD2 connection, but haven't gotten around to making one yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Car tech peaked in 2018. Everything since then has been a down grade in my opinion

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I love the adaptive cruise control of my ID3. It will not only keep the distance to other vehicles but speed up and slow down automatically based on speed limits and road features like roundabouts or turns not only by what it can see but also knows based on data from HERE.

It’s not always correct unfortunately and not usable in urban areas (should not even be allowed there in my opinion) but on highways it’s great.

But I hate the touch buttons in this car.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bigfoot@lemm.ee 18 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Physical buttons please and thank you

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

That's because they're putting dumb shit in. We have the technology for example to -

Have high beams shine around other cars. (Regulators actually fucked this up)

Put all the speed and other needed information on the windshield.

Put a thermal image on the windshield so you can see the road as if it were daylight.

Use "fly by wire" controls instead of the same control scheme as a Model T.

And quite a bit more. But no instead we have the world's worst mix of UI/UX and software in an attempt to save money and sell data.

[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Fly by wire would be a terrible design for a car, I've seen people driving on space saver tires or with taped up windows for months. If people already just ignore warning lights until something physically stops them from driving then at least having a physical steering column means there's still control after the power steering fails so that they don't go straight on into oncoming traffic.

On your other point about still using the same control systems as a model T, modern cars don't. Hydraulic steering came around in the 50s and almost all modern cars have electric power steering, the model T had completely unassisted rack and pinion steering. I can't find any definite answer on what the last car without any hydraulic steering was but I'd definitely like to find out if anyone knows.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NebGilum@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

All 4runners still reigning supreme with chonky ass thicc boi buttons and dials. Give me Android auto capabilities on a small screen, backup camera, and rear parking sensors. That's it.

My wife drives a 2023 loaded Kia Sportage. The thing is basically a smartphone on wheels. Giant dash screen with all the car controls buried in it, touch screen climate controls that double as touch screen audio/volume controls. If I want to change the AC temp I have to take my eyes off the road for a few seconds. Also a subscription service if you want to use any of the actual useful functions like remote start, remote climate control, remote door lock/unlock, sentry mode, etc. I hate where cars are at today.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 17 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I bought a $10 Bluetooth adapter that plugs into the cigarette lighter hole and then an aux cord in our 2010 vehicle. It works significantly more reliably than our other, 2020 vehicle with built-in Bluetooth, touchscreen and all the bells-and-whistles. Seriously, I turn my 2010 car on, "successful connection" every time within seconds. The 2020, I inevitably get failed connections. I don't think my phone has connected to it first try, once. And then sometimes it fails to connect either the audio or the phone calls. Or, I get it connected and my wife gets to the car with her phone and suddenly my Bluetooth connection is gone and we're listening to her phone. It's just infuriating.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All I want is tactile controls. I wanna feel when I hit the aircon control and know it's distinct from the volume control. And I wanna feel each increment of all knobs. That way, I do it by feel instead of having to look at the control panel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I love my car for the fact it doesn’t do anything crazy. Buttons and switches for everything, bluetooth for music, and a minimalist infotainment system that may as well only be there for the phone pairing process.

I might be in the minority, but I hate Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. I don’t want anything fancy, just music. I don’t want all the bells and whistles of my phone, just music.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SSJMarx@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago

It will get worse.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 16 points 2 weeks ago

Spyware needs to go, asking with selling of driver's data.

load more comments
view more: next ›