garbagebagel

I disagree with the way that the actress is responding - ie. Bewilderment as to why they would even find it to be an issue in the first place (thinking in a historical context, it obviously could be problematic).

However, it seems the actress was coming at it from a respectful point of view in the first place, had done her research, and did not intend to do any of the problematic things associated (eg. Blackface or an "accent"), so the library probably shouldn't have had an issue with it.

Though I disagree with the library's decision, I still stand with them that they can cancel whatever they want if they don't want it shown at their establishment. You can't force establishments to hold things.

I don't think about fucking my family that's gross

Don't kill yourself to raise the dead. It is not your job to fix anyone or be their mother. A good relationship (platonic or romantic) is about "whole" people sharing their lives, not about any 'halves" completing each other.

Also, go to therapy or counselling if you can afford it. It is worth it!!

On it.

I wouldn't want to give any money to her but I also wouldn't be opposed to purchasing HP books from a thrift store that donates funds to charity and then burning them just for the sake of removing just a little bit of her legacy from the world.

I don't know what face scan as I haven't flown into the states in a very long time.

In Canada we have a machine at customs that takes your picture when you come into the country. This isn't optional. I take the opportunity to make the absolute most ridiculous face I can every time and it brings me copious amount of joy. It then prints out a little slip that I give to the customs person at the gate who is usually chatting and doesn't even look at it. I imagine those slips go somewhere, though I couldn't really care less where.

Ok but wearing shoes is a social construct. People didn't wear shoes for thousands of years before shoes came along and they were just fine and full of blisters.

Yeah I mean the hatred for immigrants is certainly growing worldwide

Bill c5 and bill c2 seem to be a lot more overreaching than what the liberal government was putting out before, plus they at least had the NDP to safeguard a bit. I certainly feel like they're moving in a bolder (worse) direction.

Jagmeet was already calling for a lot of the stuff that Zohran did, but I agree, they need a new face and spin.

When I want to grow up I want to be Old Man Shooting Oranges at Teens in Park

I've been yelling about this bill for weeks. It's an extremely disturbing government overreach, but this seems to be the way the new liberal government is moving in general.