this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
188 points (87.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

35593 readers
586 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] intheformbelow@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Overfixation on sexual identity issues is bad for trans people. Slow and steady progress is better than letting radicals steal the microphone. If you don't believe me, take a look at what Alberta and Saskatchewan are doing to trans rights. The only reason they are persecuting trans people is to spite the previous federal government whose performance was so lackluster that they resorted to identity politics slogans in order to appear "progressive". Trans people already have it tough. Using them as a banner instead of actually supporting them is going to make things even more difficult for them.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I kinda feel vindicated now. after the whole "dumbledore is gay" thing, I complained that it was bullshit and made absolutely zero sense.

the whole journey none of it came up once, nor did it progress his character arch at all. it was a bit of fluff that sold books.

it cheapened the struggles of being gay IMO and honestly makes more sense now than it did then considering what kind of a vile troll she is.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 18 hours ago

I thought it was fine in a "it didn't come up because it didn't and shouldn't have mattered" way.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yup, the month has only begun but I've already bought a 2nd Order of the Phoenix to burn. Poetic, really.

I’ve already bought a 2nd Order of the Phoenix to burn

Weird, you should be able to burn the same copy over and over again. Just wait for the first one to reform from the ashes.

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You bought it used right? Don't give her sales.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Pay her to burn her books. I'd guess she's fine with that deal.

[–] GuardYaGrill@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

everyone's pretty much on board with burning Harry Potter books.

No they aren’t.

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

The displays at pretty much every bookstore I have been to recently are pretty massive. And kids still like the stories. It is hard to argue against a small child who is begging to read a massive book, as opposed to a kid wanting to stare at a screen all day.

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't want to burn the books, just strip Rowling of ownership so she doesn't profit off of them any further is all. Maybe put them in the public domain early

[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The problem with this is that if presumably the government had such power it wouldn’t just be used to silence hateful voices but also those who proclaim liberty and tolerance. The pendulum can only be given so much power when it swings both ways.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is why we should just wholesale abandon the concept of intellectual property, which is simply an extension of the exploitative private property system.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

How do artists get paid then?

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I feel this when someone from the left asks for licenses to have kids. Like you know, that swings the other way more often than not.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago

If wishes were horses, beggers would ride.

One of this things is within your power; the other, isn't.

That said, burning her books only benefits her. If you want you hurt her, find someone who wants to buy and read them, and give them yours.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not really down with burning the books, just that Rowling is using money from the series to fund a campaign against trans people.

I’m not going to spend money that someone is going to use to turn around and attack my rights with.

Like, if I was in the UK - it would be illegal for me to piss basically anywhere. Trans women are supposed to use the men’s, but because trans men are autistic self hating lesbians (the kind of shitty propaganda that bitch funds) we don’t exist and can’t piss in the men’s or the women’s.

I’m not very opposed to the mediocre children’s book series for their content - it’s just typical “the status quo is good actually.” I’m not going to give money to people who are using their money to hurt me.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I wouldn't want to give any money to her but I also wouldn't be opposed to purchasing HP books from a thrift store that donates funds to charity and then burning them just for the sake of removing just a little bit of her legacy from the world.

[–] vala@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Can we please avoid "autistic" as an insult.

Edit: I get that this was hyperbole/satire but it still can hurt people's feelings.

I didn't read it as an insult. If it was, then "lesbians" was an insult, too. It sounds like OP's just using the hate-mongers' own words.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

That’s literally what they call trans men. That is the argument. We are all supposedly autistic, which means that we can’t be trusted to make decisions over our own bodies. That is constantly used to infantilize us, and will eventually be used to take away our ability to access transition.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I got threatened with a ban on Blahaj because I pointed out basically this when somebody posted a picture of a burning Harry Potter book. It wasn't even a criticism, it was just pointing out how funny life is that, for completely opposing reasons, trans people (and allies) and crazy Fundamentalists would both support what was happening in the picture.

The author (who was apparently a mod) made some comment about "hurr durr, mah both sides" and deleted my comment. It was very confusing, as my comment showed I clearly supported one of those sides (since I even referred to the Fundamentalists as crazy).

[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Not surprised; Blahaj mods are pretty known for being ptb. Say one tiny thing they don't like and suddenly you're an [something]phobic bigot.

[–] pau_hana@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Megan Phelps-Roper did a great podcast exploring the reasons behind the backlashes against Rowling. The Witch Trials of J. K. Rowling

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The crazy fundamentalists support her now. It’s all over Facebook.

There’s a difference between burning a book as a political statement because the author is actively harming you, and having a meltdown because the book has magic in it.

It also makes me uncomfortable that you characterize this as “sides.” As a trans person, my “side” is that I deserve to live, have access to medical care, and be treated equitably. Treating this like it’s an issue with “sides” is fucked up - one “side” thinks that all trans people should be forced back into the closet or detransitioned against our will, the other “side” just wants to be fucking alive.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Yeah, you're missing the point.

They (the mod who deleted it) mentioned "both sides." I said that two groups, for that one particular thing, both arrived at the "J.K. Rowling is bad" conclusion, and those two groups are fairly diametrically opposed. Not two sides, two separate groups.

My commentary on their "both sides" was that it was a weird take, since it's clear (if there were two sides) which "side" I was on.

The why, though, wasn't the issue, and I was attaching no commentary on their motivations (with the exception of calling the Fundeamentalists crazy, because, like... "magic is real and evil and a made-up story about a magical school promotes magic" is preeettttty crazy). It was purely the irony of seeing that post and realizing crazy Fundamentalists also hate Rowling. It's like that "two strong arms clasping together" meme, with two groups that have nothing (or worse) to do with each other having one particular thing in common.

And look, I get it. It is a touchy subject, and trans people have been getting shit on for too long (especially now) and assuming the worst intentions of comments made is probably correct way more often than it should be. But even the slightest read into anything I've said shows no ill-will against trans people and their allies (and lots against crazy Fundamentalists who believe in magic).

[–] Fletcher 27 points 2 days ago

When you reveal yourself to be a bigoted, hateful person, most evolved and compassionate people tend to dislike you.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 28 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The setting is fun. The author is garbage. Also don't think too hard about the characters or the way different magical races are portrayed.

[–] Yermaw@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah if you start analysing it and paying the slightest attention with -phobias in mind the whole thing starts looking at bit sus.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not enough people. You still see people talking about it, citing their Hogwarts houses, playing the games, squeeing about news of the TV show snd so on as if nothing was amiss, and dismissing any concerns about the profits going to persecute trans people as some kind of weird Peta-tier puritanism. It’s still considered acceptable in the mainstream to be into HP and be accepted as a good person.

[–] traceur301@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah seriously, I'm not sure I've seen any anti HP sentiment in years except from people directly affected. And references just keep cropping up everywhere

[–] riskable@programming.dev 14 points 2 days ago

"It's the work of the devil!"

Maybe they were right all along. 🤔

load more comments
view more: next ›