gasgiant

joined 1 year ago
[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

Only if they didn't report such a message/activity and fully cooperate.

My understanding is that if you are party to things like this and don't take the required action then you are liable to this wider definition of making.

So you are essentially complicit in the making of them because you didn't try and stop/report it in a timely manner.

Happens with loads of other stuff like murders, terror, theft etc... Basically if you know about serious crimes and don't take any action. Then you can be found guilty of a very similar offence as the people who committed the exact offence.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Did you read the recall? Again it says hood latch switch deformation.

That may be part of the hood latch assembly but again at no point does it say that the latch not latching is the issue. Only the reporting of the latching state.

You're really rather pathetic and I'm certainly no fan of Tesla or Musk. A brief check of my previous posts would confirm this.

As you're obviously not very good at reading or understanding things then that fact probably did slip by you. You seem to be only capable of latching (you might not see what I did there being a bit dense) onto certain words without understanding the full issue.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Nope it's the latch switch. So something that is switched when the latch is closed. Not the latch itself.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Read it again. It's deformation of the hood latch switch. Not the hood latch.

Thanks for further confirming my point that you're not reading it correctly

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And what is the next word after the bit you have quoted?

Is it by any chance switch.

The full quote is deformation of the hood latch switch. Not the hood latch.

Thanks for further confirming my point that you're not reading it correctly.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago (13 children)

The comments read like a lot of people don't quite understand the issue.

The bonnet (hood if you insist) latch may not warn a driver if it isn't secured correctly. If it is secured correctly then it is fine. So it isn't going to suddenly open.

If the latch isn't shut correctly and then the sensor doesn't report this then the bonnet may open unexpectedly.

If they can use a software update to correct the reporting then that's it fixed.

There's no issue with the actual latching mechanism. It's just the sensor for reporting the latching state.

It may be that it currently works on a two value system. i.e a value for correctly latched and a value for not latched. If that's the case and isn't just not providing the second valve correctly then a simple software change to only use the latched value would fix this. As any other value or the absence of a value will report it at unlatched.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I've also heard that it's a real crazy show where anything goes.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I bet there's always a lot of fun at his house as well.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I presume you're joking. That was a one time minor deduction from thousands.

I can't believe Sunderland are in there for so long. Had no idea they'd been that consistent prior to the 80/90s and I'm a Newcastle fan.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm confused. In the wide shot is the fat dog on the left of the right?

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

That would only be because they are the only other large party. So for the majority of people/constituencies they are the best alternative if you want to vote to get the Tories out.

All they are doing is comparing the voting at the last general election, polling and then using that two give an option for the best way to vote them out.

Not sure what pro labour facts you think are on there

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

Some of those that work forces Are the same that burn crosses Uh!

view more: ‹ prev next ›