ghost_of_faso3

Because breaking American global hegemony inevitably leads to smaller blocs that are easier for communists to break up, its that simple.

Heres the neat thing, they will just import labor from even poorer countries.

Fire every single MP that voted for this into the thames

What tendency is it when you take the loose coffee and put it in a pot with some water then cook it and filter it out with a wire mesh

I tell people im an Anarchist all the time if I think they are likely to be the type of person to be affected by the mind terminating cliche of marxist=tankie=fascist.

I dont feel bad about it, im an Communist-Anarchist and an ML anyway, (I know its a lot but shit, its just the range of ideology where im like, yeah core principles are good) I could work with either and would be fine with either ideology getting us past the finish line. I have issues with anarchists who are anti-communist, but if they havent got an issue with me I havent got one with them - we want the same thing after all.

People are already dying, we're helping the people killing them.

Go wring your hands against imaginary enemies elsewhere.

so what, we've been doing spy plane targeting for them and meeting IDF generals to discuss how we're going to best stamp down on Palestine activism, any damage helps.

Iraq and Yemen are the only two countries likely to do anything.

If it was global disarm the whole thing and just keep nuclear research as an energy thing, no one should have that much destructive power.

We should follow the Sankara line, once the revolution is complete, non-violence. Otherwise why did we fight? To put on the boot?

And the USSR collapsing and the effects it had on Cuba after they adopted it proved him right.

Why would that be true? I dont really view the collapse of the USSR as really being about the collapse in material conditions - there is a reason why the collapse of the USSR is seen as a big deal due to the shock it did to the at least livable conditions prior to the rug being pulled out.

I always saw the USSRs collapse more to bad foreign policy honestly, overextending into Afghanistan was the primary one but id be interested to hear otherwise.

I dont think this necessarily vindicates his view on those specific merits

eat acid for breakfast

New Stealand