kippinitreal

That's interesting. I'm not going to lament the death of the old studios system. Sure it worked some of the time, but it was mostly bloat. Side benefit of this being, as Stewart points out, people who loved their craft got a chance to get better at it over time.

Instead of cutting the inefficiencies, silicon valley "disrupted" the system, aka undercut existing systems at a loss for the all valuable market share. Now that they're competing with themselves, they're squeezing everyone involved: creatives, technicians & the audience to make their unsustainable business model magically sustainable. The illusion "tech will save us all" is failing, AI & everything-as-a-service is their last hope.

I don't know what the alternative is? Pandoras box is open, we can't go back to the older system anymore.

That is a good point, but I think I'd like to make the distinction of saying LLM's or "generic model" is a garbage concept, which require power & water rivaling a small country to produce incorrect results.

Neural networks in general that can (cheaply) learn on their own for a specific task could be huge! But there's no big money in that, since its not a consolidated general purpose product tech bros can flog to average consumers.

That's an excellent point! Why oh why would a tech bro start a non-profit? Its always been PR.

Putting my tin foil hat on... Sam Altman knows the AI train might be slowing down soon.

The OpenAI brand is the most valuable part of the company right now, since the models from Google, Anthropic, etc. can beat or match what ChatGPT is, but they aren't taking off coz they aren't as cool as OpenAI.

The business models to train & run models is not sustainable. If there is any money to be made it is NOW, while the speculation is highest. The nonprofit is just getting in the way.

This could be wishful thinking coz fuck corporate AI, but no one can deny AI is in a speculative bubble.

Can't SAGAftra do something about this? Was this not included in the strikes earlier?

Didn't think it'd work, but a lucky guess!

Wordle 1,186 3/6

⬜🟨🟨⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Fixed & noted. Thanks!

They greedy af. They've lobbied (bribed?) to keep the corp taxes as low as possible. Then they go Double Irish with Dutch Sandwich and NOT pay the low taxes anyways. If we were to tax them appropriately then it'd be a helluva lot more than 13b imo

• Stares in potential energy *

I think unions are fundamentally for collective bargaining against consolidated powers typically capital. Police unions in the USA have been bastardized to favor their own and resisting change to a power structure that helps them, Aka losing class consciousness.

Let's say the police departments started mistreating individual cops, overworking them and sending them into dangerous situations without proper training (hint: as they do currently), how so the individuals being mistreated fight back?

What I see in America is a concerted effort to construct a Us vs Them narrative in the police force. This includes dehumanizing the "policed" and protecting their own at all costs. This is essentially losing class consciousness, where a fellow working person is seen as fundamentally evil, and the real reason its so bad for cops.

No. All labour, including cops, need unions.

I think police unions becoming class un-conscious is the problem. They have become tools of the capitalists who hav Dissolve them and make them better.

Edit: I'm speaking for police forces in general. Slave owner roots of American police departments would warrant dissolving EVERYTHING and building a fairer system, including unions.

Could it be prompts by devs are different from lay folk? For example, "write a website for selling shoes" would give a more complete result compared to "write a single page app with a postgres back end with TLS encryption" (or whatever), which would add more constraints & reduce the pool of code the AI steals from.