A VPN won't really do anything against CSS/IMSI catchers.

Sure, it's a responsible viewpoint to assume that any gun is loaded and dangerous, even until the moment you yourself have cleared it... but the case is lacking mens rea, because who in their right mind would put a hot gun as a prop on a film set? While Baldwin killed Hutchins, I find it hard to draw any criminal negligence from it.

That's an inherent problem with shared connections.

The thing with sites telling you that your login is incorrect is also sometimes intentional, so people trying to brute-force logins won't realize they're getting blocked or just that their attempt was incorrect.

And yes, the only possibility is to try a different server that hasn't been abused, or run your own.

I'm not sure what you're implying here regarding headers? Email is insecure regardless; even when using SMTP with TLS, it's not like the headers are exposed whereas the body would be encrypted or something.

Yes, and vegans can also be cannibals for this same reason, as long as the person consents.

Why would he describe so many problem-points with the tanks? If the manufacturer wasn't aware, maybe now they improve their processes? Funny troll, but doesn't seem like good opsec.

It was just a special military operation.

Your parents have root or what?

Probably is actually a "crime" for most building codes. International Residential Code for example states that "a minimum distance of 15" is required from the centerline of a toilet to any bath fixture, wall, or other obstacle"

something Mozilla doesn't even dare, as that's where they get all their Google money from

Or because they're aware that it'd be a huge waste of time and money? It'd be a lot of work to build a search engine anywhere near as good as the existing alternatives, so it'd give worse user experience and waste time.

The first thing sounds like your company has badly-designed Group Policies?

There, their, they're.