luddybuddy

joined 2 years ago
[–] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

Shouldn't have fired Gareth

[–] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I support the use of partisans

[–] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

I just highlighted the text in the image on my phone and ‘Translate Text’ came up. I don’t think I have a plugin installed.

[–] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Firefox translated it as “Media Al-harbi Yemeni” so I think it’s just the media outlet stylized similar to the banner.

[–] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 62 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Just looked at the history of Diego Garcia... why am I surprised?

[–] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Also Zulfiqar was a specific famous sword that had two blades or two points. from my knowledge it’s unclear whether the blade bifurcates side by side or front to back, there are interpretations from many periods with either.

[–] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

An excellent straw hat

 

LK Chen is going to turn this TERF Island lib into a proper commie

[–] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

you can leave out the first fuck and it still stops the AI. But you will have no fucks

[–] luddybuddy@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

There’s no way that few balloons could do anything meaningful. I’ve designed a moored balloon system for a lighting truss and we could barely get it to work. A balloon that could lift that destroyer would cover the bounds of this photo.

13
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by luddybuddy@hexbear.net to c/diy@hexbear.net
 

A woman reached out to my coop shop because she is getting rid of her late son’s tools, specifically a 40W glowforge laser. We already have a laser, so I’m passing it on. NYC area, I believe.

Edit: laser is claimed!

Edit: laser was a scam :(

 

Reading Giblin and Doctorow’s Chokepoint Capitalism and they used a term “freedom of contract” I hadn’t heard before, and which I realized that I have over-valued in my brain.

I’ve already broken through in a few spots, for instance employment contracts can obviously be exploitative and workers have little ability to negotiating the terms on their own.

Or bank loans, not because of the negotiation so much as the moral stigma attached to defaulting on loans. I can see that the bank took a risk, they can take the consequences too. Why add moral consequences to an action that already carries financial consequences?

I think this loans issue comes back to an association of business contracts with social promises, which I’ve spent some time breaking down.

The employment issue is another kettle of frogs. That comes back to consent and whether a person who is not entirely free can consent. I guess that’s the whole point of a revolution though. Any attempt to make contract law fairer to respect the fact that some parties are signing under duress will be thorny, because all people are under duress under capitalism.

There’s barely a question in there, but … thoughts?

view more: next ›