The entire planet understands what ownership means you are basically alone in misunderstanding
michaelmrose
There are many birthright citizens of all ages not just infants. They would instantly become homeless and destitute in a country where they may not speak the language and have no proof of citizenship even if they may eventually have some due to them eventually.
Furthermore this is a vehicle to deny them other human rights by selectively removing people who are entitled by our constitution to citizenship for speaking against the government.
Right of redress assembly speech to be secure in their person , and to be subject to the law not a ruler are all important rights herein denied.
Why would I define human rights by virtue of what a wiki says today?
If I own something I can put it to any lawful use without restriction or compensation. Neither taxation nor seizure for failure to pay taxes are anything like ownership.
Your mental picture fails to encompass the nuance which indeed isn't particularly subtle.
I don't think voting implies content. People continue to consent with some laws out of moral duty others because they like life outside of a cell.
I feel like this is both correct and opens a hole in most vampire films. Vamps should have been burning down homes to get at the people.
I think that they wouldn't be able to enter regardless of whether someone was home and they would know when they noticed they couldn't do so.
Ability to tax isn't ownership
Ability to seize isn't the act of seizure nor by that definition is any land owned because most everything has been taken by force at some point.
Renting wouldn't change anything unless they got permission from the owner.
He won because he can delay actually following the law until he's dead because it will be impractical to stop him
Human rights are those required for human dignity and flourishing not those which are universally possessed in a world full of distress and toil.
Freedom of speech is one such commonly understood but often denied. For instance if the content of your speech can see someone removed from the land of their birth to one where they are stateless and homeless what other rights do they possess?
Why on earth do you think not being listed in a particular document makes something not a human right