[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 day ago

Sorry, but your reply suggests otherwise.

I'm at work, I'm not going to go into a thesis on ip allocation.

The RIRs (currently) never allocate a /64 nor a /58. /48 is their (currently) smallest allocation. For example, of the ~800,000 /32’s ARIN has, only ~47k are “fragmented” (smaller than /32) and <4,000 are /48s. If /32s were the average, we’d be fine, but in our infinite wisdom, we assign larger subnets (like Comcast’s 2601::/20 and 2603:2000::/20).

Correct all noted here https://www.iana.org/numbers/allocations/arin/asn/

Taking into account the RIPE allocations, noted above, the closer equivalent to /8 is the 1.048M /20s available. Yes, it’s more than the 8-bit class-A blocks, but does 1 million really sound like the scale you were talking about? “enough addresses in ipv6 to address every known atom on earth”

If you're going to go through and conflate 2^128 as being larger than the amount of atoms on earth to a prefixing assignment scheme I'm just going to assume this is a bad faith argument.

Have a good one I'm not wasting more time on this. The best projections for "exhausting" our ipv6 allocations is around 10 million years from now. I think by then we can change the default cidr allocations.

https://samsclass.info/ipv6/exhaustion-2016.htm

Its old sure but not worth arguing further.

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Are you still there?

Cara bella, cara mia bella! Mia bambina, O Ciel! (Chell!) Que lástima! Que lástima! O cara mia, addio!

La mia bambina cara... perché non passi lontana? 'Si lontana da Scienza! Cara, cara mia bambina... Ah, mia bella! Ah, mia cara! Ah, mia cara! Ah, mia bambina! O cara, cara mia...

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago

Their sprocket based economy next?

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

Cows will also chomp down on meat and little birds if given the opportunity. I grew up on a ranch herbivore doesn’t mean vegan like peeps seem to think it does. If they feel like they’re low on a nutrient and have opportunity they’ll nom on anything. No this isn’t pica either.

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

I’m fully aware how rirs allocate ipv6. The smallest allocation is a /64, that’s 65535 /64’s. There are 2^32 /32’s available, and a /20 is the minimum allocatable now. These aren’t /8’s from IPv4, let’s look at it from a /56, there are 10^16 /56 networks, roughly 17 million times more network ranges than IPv4 addresses.

/48s are basically pop level allocations, few end users will be getting them. In fact comcast which used to give me /48s is down to /60 now.

I’ll repeat, we aren’t running out any time soon, even with default allocations in the /3 currently existing for ipv6.

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 days ago

This is the worst math that ever mathed. IPv4 is 32 bits of address space. IPv6 is 128. That is 2^32 vs 2^128. Not 2^52, which isn’t even wrong it’s just weird, hopefully this is just some weird performance joke. There are enough addresses in ipv6 to address every known atom on earth. We aren’t running out anytime soon. 96 doublings of IPv4s address space is a number you can’t fathom.

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 days ago

Reminds me of ye olde experts exchange domain.

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 5 days ago

The cat zone is for loafing and unloafing only.

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 3 months ago

I mean crashing technically counts as a landing. We can use the rocketry term lithobraking to make it sound better.

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Important note rde’s can have more than one detonation wave, most cfd simulations and prototypes have 2 or 3 chasing each other. The challenge being keeping all of them moving at the same speed so as not to flame out etc…

Edit: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Rotating-detonation-engine-with-two-shocks_fig1_323353046

The coolest thing here is we can remove compressors from engines with this approach. That’s huge complexity just poof gone and weight. And that’s ignoring the efficiency gained from these guys.

[-] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 6 months ago

The physics behind this can theoretically improve all turbines by up to 25% efficiency. Not just rockets but turbines, thats nothing to sneeze at. Your point is noted, but misguided as nasa is around for exactly this reason to push the limits of physics not building housing. This is a huge leap forward. The brayton cycle working at the top of its efficiency curve at all is akin to jet engines over propellers. It’s that big of a deal to increase efficiency by 25% for an entire class of engines.

view more: next ›

mitchty

joined 11 months ago