monsterpiece42

joined 1 year ago
[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 16 points 1 week ago

Watch it for the plot.

[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They use it similar to "rascal"

[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 26 points 2 weeks ago

Sadly almost all these comments are wrong. I work in a computer shop and we see the scam you're talking about all the time. It happened because you unknowingly opened an ad. So you clicked on a button that looked legitimate like "download" or "next" or whatever, and that pops up full screen. The fix is a good ad blocker like ublock origin. Google's being a piece of shit right now about ad blockers so I recommend something Firefox-based for effective ad blocking.

[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Owl be weighting for you right here.

[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I agree with you and I would like to add a couple points:

Safety: a lot of people buy big vehicles to feel like they have a chance of surviving a crash with another big vehicle. Not saying this is good, but it is a thing that happens and it feeds the vicious cycle.

Regulation: I know these types of threads tend to lean into "regulation good" but let's not forget that regulation caused (or a big part of it) this whole mess in the first place. Actually a couple of them: the chicken tax is a big one (a 25% tariff on imported light trucks), and the other one is the way the minimum fuel mileage requirements are calculated. Basically, you can break the math of the EPA fuel mileage requirement by making the vehicle longer. Unfortunately this looks aesthetically stupid, so it makes the proportions correct they have to be bigger in every other direction too. This mileage math is effectively what killed the mini trucks that used to be so popular like the S10, and smaller versions of the Tacoma and Ranger.

[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

I find your response baffling. I think it was completely out-of-pocket but I'm going to extend a one-time olive branch in good faith that there was some sort of misunderstanding.

I am open to a proper explanation as to how specifically it was hurtful or disrespectful. And if it was and I'm missing a social cue here, I would love to know how that equates to such an aggressive response. My absolute best guess is, that you read it as "you can't be good at anything", but I said "you can't be good at everything", which literally implies that you are good at other things.

I actually was a certified HVAC tech for a few years. I have seen people get seriously hurt not knowing when their system had steam in it or from not being able to control when the boiler kicks on (mostly renters) and steam starts shooting out of the hole mid-repair. I don't have any way to assess your skills over the internet so I suggested the safe option. Similar logic to, if you don't know if someone can work on cars, maybe don't tell them to do their own brakes.

[–] monsterpiece42@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Life itself doesn't get easier until you learn how to make boundaries and life the way you really are. Ask anyone that has "come out" as gay, trans, or autistic. It sucks at first but life gets better once you learn who you are and stop being sorry for it.

view more: next ›