I’ll take both please
Pretty sure Whole Foods had shitty conservative executives back then too didn’t they?
I see these things at construction sites pretty often and have no idea what they are for.
It’s about 5 feet tall, 2 feet wide, 2 feet deep, 3-inch wall thickness and hollow. Big circular indents on each side. They’re usually empty, sometimes with random litter inside.
What is its purpose?
Here’s todays winner for most unintelligible title
This. Have we really not learned this lesson? We need to take what he says literally and seriously.
I’d like to believe that that’s true, but I’ve been disappointed by our political system too many times to believe it .
Lifetime appointees with no accountability reject call for accountability. Shocking
Statistical modeling.
And yes, I am miffed about the use of the word “exponential” in this post’s title.
He just needed to feed the idea of it to his base. They won’t know or care that it was an imaginary report, and will never hear that the press conference was canceled.
I appreciate the idea but this is a little misleading. They chose to label transportation for farmers markets but not CSA boxes. There is obviously transportation involved in both.
They highlight delivery as a step in the food delivery service, but don’t label it similarly when the consumer goes to the store to pick it up. I might argue there’s efficiency in having one delivery driver vs everyone acting as their own delivery driver.
The tldr here is this:
These constitutional scholars dug into the original meaning of the 14th amendment and concluded that Trump easily meets the bar for having “engaged in” the Jan 6th insurrection, thereby disqualifying him from holding office.
I believe it all comes down to the term “engaged in”. Some say he didn’t because he was not literally storming the capital with the rioters. These two law professors are arguing (in a peer reviewed law journal) that the original intent of that term includes all the stuff Trump did.
That’s quite the false equivalence you’ve made there