nodoze313

joined 1 year ago
[–] nodoze313@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 5 months ago

UDP cares about the target, it doesn't care if it gets there, more like broadcast.

[–] nodoze313@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Looks like AI to me. It did a pretty good job on her hands, by comparison to many other AI rendered hands, at least she has 5 normal fingers even if they're sausages

[–] nodoze313@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 5 months ago

It does add up, it's just in base 9.

[–] nodoze313@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 8 months ago

Kind of looks like u/PantyNectar

[–] nodoze313@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 9 months ago

I ran some rough numbers on this, please pick apart. It takes 10 acres of hardwood to heat 2k ft^2 sustainably. If all land was divided equally between all living humans there would be about 2 acres per person. Not everyone needs heating, trees do not grow on 100% of the land. Definitely appears to be a privileged point, but there's some gray area.

As a temporary solution, while waiting for heat pumps to be competitive, and solar taking down huge swaths of trees, it could be rationalized to make sense, especially over oil heating.

In the area I'm located, most electric is generated by LNG at 40% efficiency, the avg daily temperature is 30°F, heat pump performs at ~1.25x. Burning wood at 50% efficiency appears to be more carbon neutral solution, when compared to all other solutions, even if you were to bury the wood taken down. At least temporarily, but when the renewable solutions are in place, it's a no brainier, heat pumps win.

I don't fully agree with the original comment, but it's not a 0IQ thought, it's best intentions, around an area of gray. There isn't a right answer, it's a moving target with a complex calculation and we need people who are trying to do the right thing, even if it's good intentions gone wrong.

[–] nodoze313@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well done, great jokes, lots of subtle references, love it!

[–] nodoze313@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 months ago

Not every single one, that would be too expensive, make it the next to last so their confidence is high.

[–] nodoze313@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Does running lint prior not resolve the issue? Isn't this the entire goal of make, cmake, autotools, etc? Why do you need to run it after? So you can re-process the macros after they are in line? Should just validate the macros before running gcc.

[–] nodoze313@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, kind of, all I do is clone, different conditions result in different buds, eg duration will definitely change the compound distributions

view more: next ›