nsrxn

joined 6 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

as convenience foods go, 2/$1 gas station hot dogs exceed 500kcal. nothing comes close.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

do you know how I know you haven't read anything jet posts there?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

no, I like summer time.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

opinions will vary on what constitutes poor treatment of an animal, but i think everyone would agree that "Treating animals poorly is not appropriate."

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

treating animals like animals is absolutely appropriate

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

it's how people justify slavery

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

no matter how many times you edit your comment here, the text you linked won't change

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

none of your stats showed veal production in nz.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

each of my statements is a verifiable fact. your reaction here smacks of a horse laugh fallacy.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

these are all just platitudes. it doesn't change the truth of what I've said.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

supply and demand is a theory about price discovery. it does not dictate market production.

whether and animal is killed entirely up to the person doing the killing. whether I buy meat or not does not change what that person decides. I can't be responsible for the actions of somebody else.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (6 children)

no, they're not. an action in the future cannot cause an event in the past.

 

before i made an account, i reached out to the chief admin of lemmy.dbzer0.com

i was recently banned during a discussion on the validity of a claim regarding the consensus about the safety of a vegan diet:

and, if you bother to go find that discussion, you'll find that, in fact, my interlocutor did become incivil. i did report that. and somehow, my discussion and the subsequent report were the basis of a ban.

it was less than 2 hours. it's almost not worth discussing.

but given my pre-application discussion, i felt strongly that my conduct is within the bounds of the acceptable use of the instance. so if my conduct is not within the acceptable use, that means i basically cant use my account(s) as i planned and under the terms which i agreed.

db0 has said he doesn't want to be the benevolent dictator for life, and has specifically both recused himself from ruling on my conduct and encouraged me to post here and in !div0_governance@lemmy.dbzer0.com (though i'm still holding off on that for now).

so, did i deserve it? power tripping bastard? what do you think?

 

itt: liberals, liberals everywhere

 

kamala Harris, as a da, locked people up and refused parole to keep them as slaves fighting fires.

mod says it's misinfo (probably without fact checking) and removes the comment

update:

idk how I was doing mod abuse

 

they made cool workout posters, and still do, but I think they got dmca'd in 2016. the superheroes are all gone.

navigating archive. org is slow and often leads to "no hotlinking" and unavailable Google drive PDFs.

anyone got these stocked somewhere?

 

i unironically love this song and wish it weren't such a biting parody of me.

view more: next ›