phthalocyanin

joined 1 year ago
[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

"negative peace "

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

toxic positivity/ negative peace aside, I would imagine that not being represented within the established political hegemony could foster some negative emotional response.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

cringe and/or lame

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

who were they doing it for, an-crap?

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

imagine a society not dependent on individual charity (with wealth expropriated from the working class) for improving material wellbeing.

does a 'nice' king justify monarchy?

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

no. power centralized in the beaurocratic state apparatus is also oppressive. electoral politics are a sham, and democracy is impotent when the capital owning class can simply buy influence.

if 9 people vote to kill the 10th, is that just?

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

itt: those in the priveledged position to rely on the state for defense of self and community would rob others of the ability to enforce their bodily autonomy and community defense.

'only the [fascist] cops should be armed' brain worms,

enforcing the capital owning class' monopoly of violence (against ourselves),

a negative peace at the expense of justice.

you know-- bootlickers.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

your position presupposes that capitalism can serve to improve our collective wellbeing, when it is fundamentally an oppressive heirarchy enforced through violence.

news flash: if you do not own capital, capitalism's essential function is not to improve your material condition, but that of the capital owning class.

edit: civility

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

argument through analogy is a logical fallacy, I'm not going to engage that.

you've yet to convince me that further entrenching capitalism (which requires scarcity to the extent that it will create it where there need be none, and demands endless quarterly growth within a limited system) is a solution to the environmental destruction to which it contributes.

it seems to me as though you would like to eat your cake and have it too.

private ownership of capital is a race to the bottom, leading inevitably to unsustainable extraction of natural resources. The latter won't be halted or reversed without abolishing the former.

we need power to be distributed horizontally, not continue to be concentrated in fewer and fewer actors.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

the non profit industrial complex serves to launder the reputations of the ownership class without meaningfully addressing oppressive systems or threatening the status quo.

 
 
 
1
lamb rack (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by phthalocyanin@lemmy.world to c/canning@midwest.social
 

alt text: in the foreground a rack of lamb ribs perches golden brown on a grate above an outdoor fire. Smoke dances in the middle ground, partially obscuring a tenant farmer's cottage seen in behind.

3
acquire the means (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by phthalocyanin@lemmy.world to c/startrek@startrek.website
 

sometimes I wish I had the lobes for capitalism

view more: next ›