ravshaul

Which means Canadians will lose their jobs, they will be out of work, and some companies in Canada will not hire because there's not enough sales to hire anybody new.

The Liberals wanted Poilievre legally silenced because his arguments were winning against the Liberal talking points. So if he is now forced to stay silent then that allows the Liberals to lie to the people, lie to the public, and Poilievre can't explain why what they are saying is false. But with him not getting security clearance he can point out falasies in their statements and argue against their logic and there is no legal danger for anything he says because he has not seen anything.

If Poilievre sees some secret information and fires a member of his own Conservative party that is mentioned in the information, Poilievre violated the security act and legally he's out. Without that security clearance he has full reign as leader without confines or legal restrictions.

That is self-aggrandizement.

He rejected the security clearance because if he mentions anything they show him he can be charged criminally on national scecurity grounds, even as a sitting member of parliment he can be charged and his seat would be in jeopardy if he talks.

The Liberals push for him to get a security clearance was all a tactic to force him into silence under threat of arrest if he mentions what he reads or sees.

What research papers have been published with all variables showing that face coverings prevent infection, and people who did not wear anything suffered permanent health damage? I'm not asking statements, but published papers that definitely show that wearing something prevented spreading, and people who didn't caused the spreading. A news story is not acceptable, only scientic journals or papers to read through the methodology and results.