a significantly worse off reputation among those that hear horror stories of “Could you believe I saw ___ on the front page? God only know what they’re hiding behind locked doors for registered members if that’s what they show to the public”

This ship sailed long ago. There's no point in trying to appeal to those that are intolerant of the existence of fetish content.

Nah, I'm of the opposite perspective on this. Keeping NSFW stuff login-gated is a slow death sentence for the site. The change to show it to everyone seems (to me) to have resulted in a slight increase in new people posting, and probably puts us above replacement level instead of below. I don't have actual numbers to back that up though.

The only change I would make is to the initial content warning popup for logged-out users. Make it more specific to burggit, and notify people that by creating an account they can filter the more extreme content. A booru-style default filter that you can change or disable without logging in would be nice to have, but would be a much more difficult change to make. Even then, I'd only have it disable auto-expand for posts from the more extreme communities, rather than hiding them entirely.

I wonder, how many people are fine with loli (or any specific genre of porn) but aren’t really into it?

I kind of fit that. I like "teen" loli stuff, but most loli art is too young for me. Sometimes I can overlook it if it's a particularly hot scenario though.

Welcome back!

What's Disa been up to, anyway? Our resident shota hasn't had any activity here in a month. Anyone know?

Comments that were lost to the time warp

Me:

The description that I have in the sidebar of !dickgirl_hentai is

Girls. With dicks!

So maybe just “girlswithdicks_hentai” for a new community name?

Doesn’t really work as general terminology though, at least if we want something shorthand. I’ve been using “futa” in post titles. Playing around with a recent one:

• Futa dominating two other girls (original title)
• Girl with dick dominating two other girls
• FPWP dominating two other girls
• Girl dominating two other girls

These all feel varying degrees of awkward. I think I’d likely just try to come up with an entirely different title if I’m trying to avoid using “futa”.

Mousepad:

If you like that new community name, I find it reasonable!

I feel I should clarify: To describe art, if the character being described is a futa, I have no problem calling them that. My issue with the term is when it is used to:

1. Describe real people,
2. Describe canonically transgender characters (e.g. Bridget from Guilty Gear), or
3. Describe all FPPWP as a catch-all (overlap with 2 here).

So I think the current post title is completely fine (assuming 2 does not apply; I do not recognize the character if so). Contrast this with terms like “trap,” which I would prefer to never see in any context, for the reason I mentioned in my reply to PB’s comment. Better terms for that do exist (femboy seems fine)!

Thanks again for making this post. It’s something I’ve been thinking about for a while, but I didn’t want to bring it up myself for fear of being “annoying,” or similar.

HEWWO

comparing to the other comments, I think like I’m a degenerate x)

Rape and incest are among the most common fetishes, and loli is quite popular as well. They're all suppressed to some degree on mainstream sites though, mostly due to credit card company policies. Incest is the most visible, due to the "they're just step-family" loophole, but the people watching those videos mostly want the real thing.

I didn't bother mentioning my interests in them, because the OP asked for obscure/strange stuff. So don't worry, you're not as far out there as you think.

Needs a follow-up with Docker-chan getting docked. But I suppose the tease is part of the appeal here.

Should probably edit this one and set the actual NSFW flag on it.

I have a thing for women in sports bras or tank tops, preferably bottomless. Like this:

nudity

Maybe not super strange or obscure, but it's what came to mind.

Roman Empire: "I feel bad for you."

Me: "I don't think about you at all."

Thinking of my previous experience, this case felt like potentially a million times worse - because it is not a topic I am personally invested in, and I don’t feel like this is my place to publicly weight on. When I say that I don’t want to bring more attention to this issue in my post I mean more specifically to the defederation event itself. I am being greedy and selfish about my time, energy, and emotional well-being. I don’t want to carry the weight of this discussion.

This is entirely reasonable, and I can sympathize.