what do you base any of these accusations on?
update:
i went through mysticmushroom's profile an there is nothing there that would support the accusations. i honestly find it disgusting to just make such accusations without proof, especially when aimed towards a trans person
you dont have to convince people based on dry theory. revolution does not necessairily mean a momentary violent insurection that overthrows what was. a revolution can be the process in which you create the structures you wish to see in the future, in the here and now. you then convince people by showing them first hand that it works and that it benefits them.
here is a great video on how to construct the revolution. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9K6ISx8QEQ
it has a bit of a slow start, and feels academic but its very very insightful. absolute recomendation.
this is the first time i hear about that "trans people are for pam people" thing.
i know some ppl consider nombinary ppl to excluded from bi, but thats just ignorance or exclusionary bs, that is not even in line with the ethemology of the word.
i personally simply vibe most with the pan label, because it is kinda seperate from gender, which fits my fuck gender mindest.
ofc its not a phobia to have preferences. my critique is towards excluding people from certain labels of gender based attraction, for things other than their gender. especially if those people are systemically opressed for their gender.
crazy example now, but sometimes that helps seeing things in a new light:
if i say that im not into old people because i am a lesbian, then thats kinda messed up, because it implies that old women are not women.
does that help?
and ofc, because we live in a cis-normative society, many people dont often think about how women can also have dicks. forgetting about that isnt necessairily transphobic but might also just be a cis-normative oopsy.
you are right, i shouldnt assume this meme has malicious intent. tbf i dont think i did assume that? but it probably came across that way... i should communicate better
thats not what i meant. the message was supposed to be "dont equate being a lesbian with disliking dick". i apologise if i failed at bringing that across. maybe next time i should be more blunt from the start
oki, i just wrote a response but then realised i misunderstood you. sorry about that
you are right, that also works
my intention was to direct attention to how the image implies cis-normativity/transphobia. altho i do see how the image did that by simplifying reality for comical effect and while i dont think i played into similarly opressive structures, i did simply reality myself in my comment.
id say its disrespectful to pretend lesbian, the label that commonly means woman/non-man lovin women/non-men to mean not being into dicks.
if you are not into dicks, then just say that, instead of pretending lesbianism excludes people with dicks.
oki, i just wrote a response but then realised i misunderstood you. sorry about that
you are right for the situation i described in my comment. you can combine being a lesbian with a lot of other things, to make it a viable contraception.
i would argue tho, that not liking dick is the entire reason one wouldnt get pregnant in your situation. the lesbian part doesnt matter. meanwhile both a transphobe and a lesbian can get pregnant on their own but a transphobic lesbian can not.
cute cobols :3