Oh I think those two are the same as the warrior, lol. My archetypes have a little tolerance. But there's definitely a dual strand -- the 'dark' hero (waylander) and the 'light' one (druss). Both ends up characterised by both aspects usually though, which is why in Gemmell theory they're unified.
Best one was lion of Macedon. I still think about that sometimes.
Whereas the left get to hate everyone! Even each other! But the hardest part of the hate is reserved for those who would reduce the quality of our experiences by being dickheads. Say, by restricting access to art. I'm with you brother! Let us hate together! Maybe even each other!
Arguably millennia ago? There has always been some degree of bartering that will never fully disappear, but money has been around for a long long time in basically all cultures
Might be that. Although your body goes into absolute overdrive during pregnancy, and it's not beyond the realms of possibility that some of the immune system reactions that kick in manage to eject some level of plastic microparticulates
Lol, well I can't say I'm surprised your bullishness on the matter persists - although I would argue that A) the current architectural model is a single process running the translation in a user-scoped session, and B) given that a bot literally can't recognise anything, any such implementation would be entirely conventional engineering, not waves hands AI voodoo magic. So I don't share your stance. But also I genuinely don't care, so that's as much attention as I'm prepared to give this particular thought experiment.
Their marriage was impossible call it a reference, there was no special love between husband and wife. But also the most he was not terrible in the world either.
Help, call a strokulance, I'm having an amb
For shared notes taking in a controlled environment - yes. It transparently happens anyway. For dynamic environments hosted by a separate service it's a whole other can of worms. You now seem to be fairly clear you're talking about the former, largely doable and indeed mostly implemented case. Nothing interesting left to talk about then.
I can absolutely see a single provider of collaborative online meetings spaces offering a 'notes' bot to the chat as a whole if they don't already do so, since that's already a thing. I see absolutely no reason why they should invest time in rearchitecting the conceptual boundaries of how private a user's interaction with an AI is. I think you've missed some of the implications of collapsing the multiple to a single whilst retaining the illusion that it is a private space
I have strong doubts about this happening in the not-too-distant future just from bots 'seeing' each other in the call. Too many variables (different platforms, different times joining the call, different default languages, different preferences on how notes should be taken). This is why many platforms offer an option to use a single canonical transcription bot - this sort of thing isn't quite as easy as you seem to imagine.
Ok that's incredible. I'm gonna get so lost now I've changed that setting. Magnificent
Babe wake up, new copypasta variant just dropped
I've thought more about it. I bet there's fucking loads in the placenta.