Part of that might be a result of much of the population not being tuned in to factual media. The right-wing outlets do a cover-for-30-seconds approach to any bad thing Trump does.
19
Young people in Africa call for a fair increase in funding for climate adaptation
(news.mongabay.com)
130
Anxious scientists brace for Trump’s climate denialism: ‘We have a target on our backs’
(www.theguardian.com)
Probably Putin, who vetoed any suggestion of other locations.
This one has a link to https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/nov/08/climate-breakdown-will-hit-global-growth-by-a-third-say-central-banks
Maybe a client issue on your end?
Or are you subscribing via mastodon instead of lemmy?
That was always the Rolling Stone business model — talk about the bands, and throw in a side of serious political news.
I wouldn't say that the movement towards state action weakened under Biden; we got some great examples of it, such as the requirement for renewables in Minnesota.
Sorry, but accelerationism only gets us a lasting fascism. It doesn't get us the kid of stable world where people can substitute wind and solar for fossil fuels
Probably six months before we see big auctions again.
They covered Project 2025 before the election, including the ties Trump's circle has to it.
This is generally not a great way to do it, since the emissions largely coming from fossil fuel burning. Fewer people doesn't help much if we burn even more.
If they actually worked, it would be payment to somebody who has taken an action to prevent emissions they otherwise would not have prevented. In practice, it's 90% middlemen who claim to have paid somebody to take such an action, but no such action actually occurred, or a completely ineffective action occurred.