[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My issue with nuclear energy isn't that it's dangerous or that it's inherently bad. The world needs a stable source of energy that compensates for wind and solar fluctuations anyways. For the current realistic alternatives that's either going to be nuclear or coal/oil/natural gas. We have nothing else for this purpose, end of discussion.

My problem is the assumption underlying this discussion about nuclear energy that it somehow will solve all of our problems or that it will somehow allow us to continue doing business as usual. That's categorically not the case. The climate crisis has multiple fronts that need to be dealt with and the emissions is just one of them. Even if we somehow managed to find the funds and resources to replace all non renewable energy with nuclear, we would still have solved just 10% of the problem, and considering that this cheap new energy will allow us to increase our activities and interventions in the planet, the situation will only worsen.

Nuclear energy is of course useful, but it's not the answer. Never has technology been the answer for a social and political issue. We can't "science and invent" our way out of this, it's not about the tech, it's about who decides how it will be used, who will profit from it, who and how much will be affected by it etc. If you want to advocate for a way to deal with the climate crisis you have to propose a complete social and political plan that will obviously include available technologies, so stop focusing on technologies and start focusing on society and who takes the decisions.

One simple example would be the following: no matter how green your energy is, if the trend in the US is to have increasingly bigger cars and no public transport, then the energy demands will always increase and no matter how many nuclear plants you build, they will only serve as an additional source and not as a replacement. So no matter how many plants you build, the climate will only deteriorate.

This is literally how the people in charge have decided it will work. Any new developing energy source that is invented serves only to increase the consumption, not to replace previous technologies. That's the case with solar and wind as well. So all of this discussion you all make about nuclear Vs oil or whatever is literally irrelevant. The problem is social and political, not technological.

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago

The economy is indeed doing amazing, just not for us

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And they kept on voting blue and both parties kept on getting more reactionary and moving the center to the right ad infimum...

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 131 points 1 month ago

So it's ok to call students that are protesting against a genocide Nazis but not the people actually committing the genocide. Got it.

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

I mean what will they make us do next??? Ask us to call them by their names as well?

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's the whole deal of maximizing profit. If you can get your employees to work extra for free, you have a very successful business model.

If you think this is sad then maybe you'd agree that we need a change.

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Fuck them. I'd rather donate quadruple the money for premium to my favourite creators directly than give a single penny to this parasitic mega corporation.

The issue is not only the ads, it's the stupid shit it throws you to keep you hooked, it's the stupid shorts that literally no one asked for, it's every stupid little thing that fights for your attention. Basically the app doesn't work for you, it works against you. That's not the case with third party apps, they have you, the user, in mind, not their profits.

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 months ago

Good, your attention is a commodity, don't let advertisers steal it. We've been assaulted with enough ads in public spaces already.

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 months ago

Yeah you're right, who likes no pollution, no noise, strong communities and third places to bond with people, kids having public spaces to play in their neighborhoods, green, sustainability, healthy, active people that don't sit in front of a wheel all day long... Who likes all that seriously?

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago

Not really the point of a news outlet is it?

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 72 points 4 months ago

He was too innocent for this world. I don't know what to say other than I promise I will never forget him and that I'll try to spread his message and do everything I can to help free Palestine.

[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 24 points 4 months ago

In this entire discussion PUBLIC TRANSPORT has to be the number one measure. It has to be the first thing you see on your home page. Abolish cars, inside cities at least

view more: next ›

sweetpotato

joined 5 months ago