thatsnothowyoudoit

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

An ex-Google, ex-Apple, leadership chatbot focused on improving outcomes with data and cat memes, hustling 24/7.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not accurate at all.

Daddy and top-dog-son want to prevent the rest from moving the media business away from fringes of the right.

The claim is that they’ll devalue the inheritance for all by making it less profitable (summary only).

Great coverage a few weeks ago on NYT’s The Daily podcast if reading isn’t your thing: https://pca.st/episode/7ff0fd47-2c1c-471e-a41f-6861322838f9

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

2 years plus source code and working oss backends or 10 years (and still source code).

2 years will just ensure endless forced upgrade cycles IMO.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it’s a backup server why not build a system around an CPU with an integrated GPU? Some of the APUs from AMD aren’t half bad.

Particularly if it’s just your backup… and you can live without games/video/acceleration while you repair your primary?

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Shawshank Redemption.

The Big Lebowski.

Also Star Trek 2.

So many great ones though.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Write to LanguageTool. They’re OSS in name only at the moment. I self-host their server, but the client is only usable on desktop and limited to web browsers without their paid version.

I’ve long been asking to be a customer, but to use their self-hosted server for privacy.

I think there’s a small but growing market for folks that want a quality grammar and spell check but don’t want data sent to the cloud.

If I could connect iOS to my LT server that’d be so rad.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Is there a reason you need a dual book instance instead of a VM or even WINE?

Unless you need direct access to hardware and if you have enough RAM, you can probably avoid dual booting altogether.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Having ridden DI2 for over 10 years, in the Canadian winter, with salted roads, I have to believe you’ve never used/maintained/serviced an electronic drivetrain.

The mechanical parts will fail as equally quickly - in the same places - if not maintained.

I’ve not yet had an electronics failure on my three electronic drivetrains. Mechanical bits will wear out as per usual.

Until the recent influx of low-cost electronic group sets, the ones on sale from SRAM and Shimano were high-end enough that they were/are incredibly reliable with the exception of the first generation external Di2 Dura Ace battery which had a poorly designed mount that would indeed cause issues over time. The internal battery remedied that issue.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I’ve been running Di2 since 2014 on my gravel grinder. It was a mullet setup with Ultegra DI2 / Wolftooth extender, XT cassette, SRAM 1x chainring and crank. I moved up to a clutched XT Di2 rear as soon as it was available. No dropped chains.

The shifting, now 10 years later, is AS GOOD as the day I got it. The battery, also 10 years old, still only needs charging 1-3 times a year depending on how much I’m riding that bike.

I went SRAM Eagle AXS for my bike packing bike.

It’s not as good as 11-speed XT Di2, even though my Eagle is XX. But the small drop in shifting performance (still sky high) is made up for by the ease-of-use. When I bought the bike, it was lightly used and setup as a single speed. Wireless electronic shifting made the switch easy. The most complicated thing was changing the freehub body to XD. After that it was put on the shifter, the derailleur and I was off to the races. I’ve taken it on days-long bike packing trips and I can do it all on a single battery, but I keep a spare on me because it’s so tiny.

My mountain bike has SRAM Transmission on it and it’s as perfect as shifting could ever be (also bought used because the bikepocalypse is real and I might as well take advantage).

With electronic shifting, I love that I can customize it to a level not possible with cabled shifting. I like that I can choose the speed of the shifts, which button does what, and I have my Shimano and SRAM bikes setup to match each other: same buttons for higher/lower gears and the same hold-for-3 multi-shift behaviour.

Now, bear in mind that when I get on my cabled-bikes, I don’t really think “boy this sucks” - but I maintain them all well.

Electronic shifting is incredible. I would never go back for my main bikes unless it gets all cloud-subscribers-enshittified (which is highly probable LOL).

But, being honest, it is truly a luxury and in no way needed. Any bike being ridden is a great bike.

AMA else. I’m here for it.

Aside: hilariously this is the Shimano semi-wireless Di2 in this article which is part of the sad decay of Shimano in general (I’m looking at you unreliable-shimano-power-meter and crank arms coming unbonded). The most popular wireless electronic kits are SRAM and, if I understand it correctly, they’re not affected by this particular issue. Doesn’t mean hackers won’t find one of course!

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Park CC-4.

It replaces Shimano’s infamous tool, is good for all chains, reliable, and is exceptionally affordable.

Chains that were showing “worn” on my Park CC-2 show as “still good” on the CC4 and the CC-4 is good for everything including 13-speed, Flattop and T-Type chains.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago

Seems that Mr. Trump wasn’t singing the same tune when it went his way in October 2016 with a certain FBI director…

 

cross-posted from: https://derp.foo/post/136732

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

 

While this is probably more interesting for a synthesizer community, Alex usually touches on how these instruments influence production and writing. Plus he's a brilliant musician in his own right.

And so, I thought it equally belongs here.

Hearing that opening line brings back so many memories.

 

It looks like the transition to a single company is underway.

This kind of monolithic beast isn't often musician friendly (look at what Waves tried recently). But, it also opens up the door for new players to make some headroom (har har).

It'll be interesting to see how the matrix of these products looks in a year's time.

 

It could be anything from tutorials, YouTube channels, plugins/software, anything goes for this first post.

One of the most recent things I've stumbled across recently was Baphometrix's Clip-to-zero series. While I don't work on music that needs to be competitively loud, the in-depth series helped provide a new perspective to incorporate into decades-old mixing habbits.

Link to the playlist:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UT42-ur080&list=PLxik-POfUXY6i_fP0f4qXNwdMxh3PXxJx&pp=iAQB (I didn't watch every episode)

I also really appreciate the work Dan Worrall is doing these days: https://www.youtube.com/c/DanWorrall

view more: next ›