throwback3090

joined 3 days ago
[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago

It's not for them

It's for us

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's Forbes, it's hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes' pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago

It doesn't mean she's definitely a hypercapitalist con-artist or nazi.

More likely, sure, but it sounds like she did a lot of work in the public space which drops the chance of Nazi down significantly and con artist down to....hold up, which year was this?

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 day ago

Every generation is peddled two insane concepts:

When they are young, they are told that they have a weird bizarre vernacular which sounds stupid to everyone else.

Then when they are old, they are told young people have a weird bizarre vernacular which sounds stupid to everyone else.

Then you die.

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some are racist 20-somethings

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 day ago

No at Tesla he abuses his own workers and isn't held accountable by the executive branch.

Here he is abusing our workers and isn't held accountable by the judicial branch.

Totally separate.

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

You criticized people for "not lifting a finger" and get mad when someone asks which finger you personally lifted? You are only allowed to criticize people for living their life if you are not a hypocrite. It sounds like of the items you listed I'd describe 60% as barely lifting a finger (phone canvas, minimal value; "vocal" online, zero value) and 40% as definitely lifting a finger (volunteering at unspecified org) which makes you not a hypocrite by my personal math.

I personally have no intention at all of answering your question because I didn't make any statements as generally attacking as your own to start with, and feel no need to justify asking you to show your stripes.

I am not sure where guns came into play. However, I don't think you should be owning guns: you don't seem 100% stable given the disproportionate response, and I would worry that disproportionate response would come out while driving or other stressful activities.

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But I got the opportunity to make a dumb joke about math that you seemingly got mildly butthurt about, so really it all works out.

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Is there an example in the last 40 years of this working in the United States?

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I said that will stop this in any way. Do you have an example of this working in the last 40 years?

[–] throwback3090@lemmy.nz -4 points 2 days ago (5 children)

What have you done to stop this?

view more: ‹ prev next ›