this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
496 points (99.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39251 readers
247 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No one is saying it is their job.

Merely that using a TLD like .internal requires some consideration regarding ssl certificates.

[–] lud@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But why are people even discussing that?

This is about an ICANN decision. TLS has nothing to do with that. Also you don't really need TLS for self hosting. You can if you want though.

Because people can discuss whatever they like?

If you don't like it just down vote it.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

People can talk about whatever they want whenever they want. The discussion naturally went to the challenges of getting non-self-signed certificates for this new TLD. That's all.