this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
564 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2377 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The new matchup between Trump and Harris is helping Democrats close the enthusiasm gap, in part by capturing the attention and interest of young voters who historically vote at lower rates than older generations. But the historic nature of Harris’ candidacy as the party’s first Black woman and South Asian presidential nominee, coupled with the rapid shift in the campaign’s tone, has young voters of all political stripes taking a hard look — some for the first time — at the role they could play in November.

If motivated, Gen Z voters could have a major impact on elections. Texas’ population has the second youngest median age of any state, other than Utah. And in 2020, there were about 1.3 million Texans ages 18 to 24 who were registered to vote. Those voters have historically turned out to vote at rates lower than any other age range, with voter participation rates increasing steadily as age ranges increase.

About 43% of young Texans aged 18-29 voted in 2020 — an eleven point increase from 2016. 66% of all eligible voters and 76% of eligible voters age 64 and older voted that same year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 159 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Look at that. Young people excited to vote. It's almost as though all the party needed to do was run a better candidate.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I am always very cautious about leaning on the “youth vote“ too much because as much as we can rightfully blame the Democrats for putting their thumb on the scale against Bernie, he also thought the youth vote was going to save his ass and they simply did not show up in the numbers people expected, not by a large margin. Especially in 2020.

Also people tend to think Gen Z should save us from our mistakes when only about 75% of them are even age-eligible to vote this election. If was less than half in 2020 IIRC. Millennials and Gen X need to grab the reins and invite Gen Z along.

[–] DoctorWhookah@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 months ago (2 children)

My GenX ass will be taking my Z’s to the polls with me!

I’m doing my part!

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago

Same here on both counts!

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

My Gen X butt got a late start so I will have to wait until 2028 to drag my future voter with me. The magats know that the demographics are against them - every day boomers be dying and Zs(Alphas now?) be turning old enough to vote.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Agreed. And us old folks have it easier on election day because we are either a) retired or b) have a good job that doesn't care if we take a long lunch, come or go early.

One thing I've always hated about these articles (and by extension, this whole topic) is all the factors that are left out of the discussion. Like when people talked about Millennials not protesting like they did in the 60s, they conveniently ignore how things have changed for Gen X and younger - how more economically tenuous and unstable living conditions are, how senior jobs are still filled with Baby Boomers that would've retired a decade earlier had they been their parent's generation, how job benefits have declined (like time off), etc. Older people vote more not just because "young people are lazy," as so many of these discussions insinuate, but because they have better economic security, more time either through retirement or better job benefits, and more knowledge of the process. We won't see major shifts in Gen X and younger voting turnouts until we can improve work/life balance, because the Boomers pulled the ladder up after them and left the rest of us to slave away for 50 hours a week with no vacation time.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For someone who hasn't voted before, showing up in a primary with a random date is a lot harder than showing up on a single, nation-wide election day.

Huh interesting I honestly had never even considered that.

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Let's see if they actually do. I'm not holding my breath.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Why would you blame the youth when the southern establishment has repeatedly made it harder for them to vote in the first place?

Also Texas youth voter turnout has only gone up since 2016, and was instrumental of the purpling of Texas during both 2020 and the previous midterm elections. You're pulling the classic of blaming the younger generation for something that is not their fault.

Eat some avocado toast while educating yourself maybe.

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Where have I blamed anyone for anything? You and the other poster are tilting at windmills getting you knickers into a twist over things nobody has said.

I'm just old enough to have heard all of this many times before. But sure, I'm the one that needs educating. 🙄

I'm all for optimism and I truly hope Texas goes blue. But I bet you it won't.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm just old enough to have heard all of this many times before. But sure, I'm the one that needs educating

Here's the thing though, what you're "hearing" is a false narrative, and I linked you the numbers to prove it. The voter turnout for younger generations is on par or only slightly lower than other generations, and actually higher in the key battleground states. So why are you so defensive and pessimistic instead of acknowledging what you "heard" about youth turn out might be false and actually a systemic problem, not a generational one?

I'm all for optimism and I truly hope Texas goes blue. But I bet you it won't.

Texas literally cannot go full blue unless there are several districts that are un-gerrymandered. It's part of the Republican capture of battleground states. Again, a systemic problem that you imply are an individual's fault.

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Jesus fucking christ, enough already. You're still trying to put words into my mouth that haven't been said. Go outside or something.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago

I can't, it's +42C outside 🥲

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You're right. Fuck 'em. The only people who we should ever attempt to appeal to are decrepit conservative fossils. No one else will ever matter and boomers are immortal so we'll never need anyone else, so earning the resentment of multiple generations is something we can get away with.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

🎶 Hello Poe's Law, my old friend🎶

😂

[–] IHawkMike@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago

I never said any of that. Or even suggested it. But you can go ahead and keep being angry about things you've made up in your head.