this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
285 points (91.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26778 readers
1368 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No comments or anything, just lots of Downvotes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Where anyone puts the “center” of the political spectrum is arbitrary and ultimately irrelevant. What we should still be able to expect is that it gets the ordering of sources correct—i.e., it doesn’t label Source A as being to the left of Source B if it’s actually to the right. And that relative ordering is still useful, as long as we bear in mind that the actual labels are otherwise arbitrary.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They (MBFC) explicitly state that they rate sources as more credible the closer the sources are to their arbitrarily selected centre.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 37 points 2 months ago

Which is ridiculous. If Democracy Now or ProPublica take great pains to get all their facts right (which they do), and the New York Post regularly outright makes shit up, they're marked as equally reliable based on that metric, because they're supposedly an equal distance away from the centre.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It puts Reuters as the center and that seems pretty accurate, IMO.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Non-US politics is more complicated than "left vs right".

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Definitely—so sources that are close together when projected onto a left-right axis may be far apart in a more multidimensional political space. But the relative ordering along that axis can still be accurate, even if the implied proximity isn’t.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

The assumes that the US Democrat-Republican spectrum is indeed a straight line in that space, and they are diametrically opposed.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

US politics is too.