this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
1111 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2718 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

Seriously though, no such bill would ever make it to her desk. So I don’t know what they’re crying about.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Never let the truth get in the way of a good ol’ fashioned fear-mongering!

[–] ours@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How messed up is the US that universal health care is fear-mongering?

But I guess I shouldn't be surprised. I used to have an American boss who felt like she needed to convince me to leave the hell-hole country I was living in. I live in Europe in one of the World's safest, most democratic, wealthiest countries. And this was during the W. Bush era. I bet she became a full MAGA trumpist.

[–] TTH4P@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Healthcare is Threat.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago

Healthcare is Threat.

I mean supposedly MAID gets suggested or even approved way too often in Canada according to some media, so yeah? Kinda? Maybe?

Tobe fair, MAID does reduce future medical costs per patient more than most other treatments, so there is that.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

It’s so incredibly messed up.

I think that the primary reason that anyone not standing to directly profit from the current system opposes universal healthcare is selfishness; they’ve worked hard to earn their (probably shitty) health insurance, and giving free health access to those they deem ‘undeserving’ devalues their own efforts.

Never mind the positive economic impacts; they wont move the needle. It’s like that one MAGA supporter said when interviewed; “they’re not hurting the_ right_ people”

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 months ago

Easily the single best description of American politics.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

If Repubs didn't lie about their opponents, how would they campaign?

[–] inbeesee@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A president can do ANYTHING in an official capacity now dontcha' know

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

like have Trump put down? Didn't the USSC rule that is A-OK?

She could have him drone-struck in Mar-a-lago and no one could do a damn thing about it

[–] inbeesee@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yup. I'm curious what "official capacity" means here. Does that mean anything goes if he says the magic words "official capacity"? Or is it more complicated than that

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

It's slightly more complicated than that. You have to ask "are they a Republican or a Democrat?". If the answer is Republican, it's probably an official act. If the answer is Democrat, it is not an official act. If the answer is "It's Donald Trump", then they follow up with the question "how high?".

Wow, the law is so complicated, I tell you what. Thank goodness we have highly qualified, politically neutral judges to interpret it for us.

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's carte blanche.

A president could start a national drug cartel and it would be legal