this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
962 points (98.7% liked)

Gaming

2935 readers
1 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 118 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

"Emulators are only OK when we specifically release them for our own hardware to run an extremely limited catalog that we hand pick and then charge the price of a brand new release for. Everyone else get fucked"

[–] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Don't forget releasing pirated copies on our stolen emulators that we are now charging money for!

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wtf? That happened to Nintendo? O.o

(I thought that was the PS mini)

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They've been suspected of selling downloaded ROMs several times, but the incident with the most evidence was when they released a port of a GBA collection of Medabots games on the switch eShop using a pirated version of the mGBA emulator. Like: there were strings of code matching from the original emulator.

The EULA of mGBA actually allows commercial use, but Nintendo didn't credit the emulator or the author, making it piracy.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Given that Nintendo probably doesn't develop Medabots games, wouldn't that not be Nintendo that committed piracy in that case?

Just looked it up -- not even published by Nintendo.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It isn't eBay where anybody can sell anything. Nintendo curates and specifically authorizes all games sold on the platform, and they also license the right to emulate their legacy hardware in commercial releases on their platform.

They charged money to allow the sale of pirated software.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I think that's a bit of a stretch. To what extent do you think Nintendo was aware of the particular details in this situation?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

What's the story here?

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I thought this was a 3rd party company, not a Nintendo 1st party product. I can't remember the name, but it was a company that rereleases out of print games on physical cartridges.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Don't mind if I do!"

uses their official emulators to play roms on SNES Classic and Switch

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

"no wait, not like that!"

[–] Fashim@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Meanwhile there's a bunch of evidence suggesting Nintendo used pirated ROMs for their own emulators.