this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
1080 points (94.1% liked)

Political Memes

5511 readers
748 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Okay, so then why do we have a word for woman? What is the intention of that category? Is it really necessary to define anyway? If not, why does it matter what a woman is except its what she calls herself?

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We have a word for woman because it is a useful descriptor. The intention of the category is to presuppose useful information about a person. In some situations it is necessary to define. No need to answer the if not question.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

presuppose useful information about a person

Yes, and in your opinion, what specifically is that information?

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well if someone says to me "that woman is suspicious" and there are two people who present as men, and one who presents as a woman, then I'm going to keep my eye on the woman.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And how would you know which one was the woman?

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The one which presents as a woman. Because me, and virtually everyone else is using a definition which has utility (not yours).

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah, I see the definition. "A woman is someone who presents as a woman." You're right, that's much better and much less recursive.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Actually, my full statement would be "a woman is someone who presents with the role of the previous definition of woman (biological female).

Which is my original definition.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How does a "biological female" present?
Do they wear dresses?
Ah yes, biological dresses.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, not a kilt at least lol.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And what specifically about her presents as a woman to you?

It's funny you're such a coward about actually saying this, since you're the one claiming this basis exists. If it's there and you can know it immediately on sight, then what about the woman you're imagining in this scenario makes her a woman to you?

"Vittually everyone else is using a definition," so what is it? You refuse to say directly. And how do you know everyone else uses that definition? Multiple people itt have defined it as I and Erin have- any woman who identifies as such.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The problem is actually just that you're not listening to me.

Let me show you.

This is Two Guys and a Girl

One of these three people presents as a girl, right?

There is not one specific defining feature of her gender as she presents herself, it's the outcome of many variables.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, it's that they fit the gender binary you've been trained to spot your whole life. However, we've found that the gender binary is inaccurate and wrong so it's stupid to force people to follow it arbitrarily.

I am reading what you're writing, I just disagree and you think I should agree. No thanks.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 0 points 3 months ago

Okay, so we disagree. You don't need to accuse me of being malicious or deceitful. I'm doing my best to convey what I believe, same as you.

I could just as easily accuse you of not sincerely stating what you believe.