this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
1580 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59179 readers
2346 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No they shouldn’t. They should cease to exist

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Good luck putting the cat back in the bag.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

I have cats. Putting them back in a bag or box is easier

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well if everyone who’s copyrighted work independently sues OpenAI, that cat will be deceased real quick due to bankruptcy

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Fuck copyright they used gplv3 code why isnt it open source

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Generative AI is not going back into the bag. If not OpenAI, then someone else will control it. So we deal with them the next best way, force them to serve us, the people.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then they can either pay for the copyrighted data they want to train on or lobby for copyright to be reigned in for everyone. Right now, they're acting like entitled twats with a shit business model demanding they get a free pass while the rest of us would be bankrupted for downloading a Metallica MP3.

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

I think this better solves the issue.

The problem isn't necessarily the use of copyrighted works, (although it can be a problem in many ways) it's the unfair legal determination of who is allowed to do so.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

Nobody should profit from copyright violation. Yes, copyright law needs to change, but making money isn’t an exception

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 months ago

Generative AI is not going back into the bag.

It probably will, though, once model collapse sets in.

That's the irony, really... the more successful it is, the sooner it'll poison itself to death.