this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
1072 points (97.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

4956 readers
3 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think gun people are counting the police as good guys with guns.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No they don't. If you ban guns from citizens, police would still have guns in the US.

The argument of "Good guys with a gun" is about citizens not able to kill the "bad guy with a gun" before the police arrive.

[–] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 months ago

Unbelievable that fucking guy or lady said that and got any upvotes. Living under a goddamn fucking rock. Thank you for correcting.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That makes it 142/433 where the shooter was shot by a “good guy with a gun”. Hardly a great figure either way…

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Especially after the murdering was already done.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Then why does everyone else need them?

[–] Liz@midwest.social 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A genuine, actual answer is that when you're being attacked, it is incredibly rare for a police officer to be standing there, ready to intervene. In life-or-death situations the police really only exist to take a report from whoever is left standing, and potentially make an arrest. There's plenty of people out there who don't have the strength to defend themselves in hand-to-hand combat, and even if they did, next to nobody has the skills necessary to reliably defend against a knife attack using their bare hands. That's just plain how knife attacks work.

You can counter this with statistics that show that access to guns increases injuries and deaths, because they absolutely do, but pro-gun folks put the individual before the group on this issue. The individual, in their mind, should have the right to quick deadly force in order to facilitate defense of their own life, and other's failure to handle that responsibility is not their problem and/or the price of that right.

There are always tradeoffs, in any policy you set for society. If you go the other direction there will be people who are victimized who would otherwise have been able to defend themselves. Which scenario is worse? How many victims of one type are worth victims of the other?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

How does this turn into a knife argument? That’s just a distraction. We do already restrict certain types of knives, plus you can’t walk down a city street with a machete.

More importantly I can shut a door between myself and an attacker. Try that if they have a gun

[–] JayDee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

They're saying that if someone tries to attack you with a knife (or even no weapon), pro-gun proponents argue you should have a right to a firearm to defend yourself against that attacker, citing that most people straight up do not have the physical ability to ward off the attacker (who is on average an adult man).

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would argue having a firearm is unlikely to help. At close range, knife has the advantage and you probably won’t even get the gun out. At longer range, running/avoiding is a better choice if you can.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago

There's a few YouTube channels that I think do a good job of being level-headed when it comes to analysing self-defense and giving decent advice around it. Hard2Hurt, Armchair Violence (a more general channel that recently did a video on unarmed knife defense), and Active Self Protection are three that come to mind right off the bat. All three say the same thing: • avoid sketchy locations if you can • pay attention to the people around you, especially in what are called "transition areas" like when you walk out of a store • deescalate conflict as much as possible (without giving in to demands) • leave as soon as you're able • only fight when your hand is forced

As far as I'm aware, they all also advocate for carrying pepper spray and participating in folkstyle wrestling to use as your defensive base for things that don't require lethal force. The problem is, you don't have the only say on whether a situation will become a threat to your health and safety or not. Sometimes you're just unlucky and a guy flips out on you for something petty and now you've got a guy pushing and shoving yelling about how he's gonna fuck you up and you can see a pocket knife clipped in his pocket.

Most firearm uses are at very close range. If you practice your draw—and you absolutely fucking should—you should be able to draw and fire multiple rounds with a person busy punching or stabbing you. (Through what usually happens is the victim manages to get a window of separation and uses that to draw their weapon.) After a few shots your attacker will have had enough time to react to what you're doing, but most people react to being shot in the gut by falling over. It's mostly a psychological thing, but surprisingly effective. Once they do that, turn and run. All you're trying to do is get them to stop hurting you so you can get away safely.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Well, you know, the more guns, the less gun violence. Yeeeeeeah, right. Since we officially have more guns than people, it should all be over soon.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tyranny, or something I believe is the argument.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The last time citizens with guns stood up against the government was the Civil War, and they were standing up for their right to enslave other Americans.

Think someone needs to revisit the math.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Definitely agreed.