this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
1029 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3890 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

She set a tone at the very start when she walked right into his space to shake his hand and made him almost pull back into himself in response. She was in charge and never stopped being in charge. 

Harris also managed what neither Joe Biden nor Hillary Clinton nor any of the 2016 Republicans managed to do which is successfully bait Donald Trump and get under his skin. Within a few minutes Trump was visibly angry and not in a way that empowered him but in a way that made him lose focus, go down rabbit holes and generally go off onto damaging tangents. Spittle anger, not righteous anger, shall we say.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 157 points 6 days ago (11 children)

As soon as she said small crowd size and low energy people leaving early he lost it lol

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 80 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It was such obvious bait, I was a bit shocked that he took it!

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 86 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I wasn’t shocked at all (except the general shock that a person like this has ever come close to the presidency). Particularly in recent years, I’ve seen him take bait so many times which wasn’t even intended as bait, but it triggered him. And because it slightly grazed his fragile ego, priority number one for him is to go on an ego-defending tangent that only confuses and undermines any points he could have made about the actual topic.

Harris knew that as long as she peppered her responses with a trigger here and a trigger there, he would be unable to help himself every time. And that’s what we saw.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 46 points 6 days ago

Yeah I don't understand how people are still surprised by this either. He is an unrepentant, raging malignant narcissist. He physically - biologically! - cannot resist defending his ego when challenged.

The entire reason he ran in the first place was because Obama made a joke about him in a speech, and it embarrassed him.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 37 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm more shocked that Democrats haven't tried to bait him this way much before. It's not hard to get him to prattle on about nothing while you look like the grown-up in the room.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"When they go low, we go high" 😑

[–] frezik@midwest.social 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ahh, right, that shit that sounded nice but didn't work.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’d work if Americans weren’t morons. But we are so we go low now

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Only took us 8 years to figure out

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 6 days ago

“When they go low, we ~~go~~ give them a high knee”

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Really? You were shocked? Lol

load more comments (7 replies)