474
submitted 10 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The order also explicitly limits Trump’s ability to attack witnesses or his co-defendants, including on social media.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] donuts@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago

That's like fucking nothing to the mega rich like Trump.

The fact that we have a two-tiered justice system couldn't be more obvious than a rich white politician getting slapped on the wrist despite leading an insurrection against American democracy while poor black men are killed in the street by militant cops for literally no reason. Gross on so many levels.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago

This isn't a slap on the wrist punishment, this is the bond to not be held in jail pending trial.

[-] rynzcycle@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

But it's still wildly unfair. Imagine getting a $10k bond, you either need $10k cash you can part with temporarily (assuming you show up and are innocent) or far more likely you need to pay $1k to a bondsman that you won't get back. Someone living paycheck to paycheck might not have the savings and so they either pay a poor tax or spend some time in jail.

But for the rich, they always have the funds, or someone willing to loan it for a lot less than 10-15%. And it's rarely set high enough to be a significant deterrent.

Illinois just became the first state to eliminate cash bail, because you're either a flight/violation risk or you're not, money shouldn't tip the scale.

[-] AlataOrange@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

This amount of money is a slap on the wrist compared to what he claims his wealth is. If you or I would commit this crime this would be equivalent to < $100 for bond

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 4 points 10 months ago

Bond isn't based on ability to pay...

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago

If it's not based on ability to pay, what even is the point?

[-] AlataOrange@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Rules for thee but not for me

[-] comedy@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

It's only to assure the accused comes back to face the charges. It isn't a penalty. Otherwise, the thinking goes, the defendant will have no reason to come back and face the court. This was probably extra true around the time of the founding of the US, when someone could more easily slip away and start a new life

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 10 months ago

If it's not not based on ability to pay, it can't possibly work like you describe. Instead poor people get stuck in jail because they can't pay, and rich people never set foot in jail because the bond is pocket change to them. From what I gather, that's exactly how it works in practice, so it's really just a system to give special treatment to rich people and punish poor people who haven't been convicted of a crime.

[-] comedy@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

In a practical sense, it does work as you say, and can prevent the poor from obtaining bail. The system wasn't explicitly designed that way, and rich people who are dangerous to the community can get super high bail set as well. Source: I'm a lawyer

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

But then that does make it into a penalty.

[-] comedy@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Sure, for all practical purposes it can be, but unlike a penalty like a speeding ticket, you can get your money back if you show up.

[-] macrocephalic@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Isn't it? Shouldn't it be? Isn't it supposed to be a disincentive? What's the risk of losing $200k to a man who is supposed to be worth billions (but is surely worth hundreds of millions at least)?

[-] donuts@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You're right. I'm not trying to say that he's been sentenced or anything, but I'm referring to how little money $20,000 is to a guy like Trump. We're talking the price of a moderately used 2017 Honda Civic as bond for a guy who participated in a malicious conspiracy to overturn the results of a democratic election (in multiple states, mind you). It's a start contrast to the fact that there are countless innocent people who have lost their lives for no due to a justice system that is all too ready and willing to lay down the law against little people like you and me.

If we did even 1% of what Trump has done we would be held without bail until the date of our trial.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
474 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18075 readers
2680 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS