this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
326 points (97.4% liked)

Privacy

32424 readers
316 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First time this happens to me. With a German protonvpn server.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 105 points 2 months ago (3 children)

YouTube doesn't like VPNs. Harder to track you (and sell/monetize your data) if they can't tell who you are.

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 65 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I desperately want a viable alternative to come along. There’s a lot of great content on YouTube, but the platform is increasingly being enshitified.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pornhub.

They have the technology and many of the features in place.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now if only you could hide the pornographic stuff to not accidentally see disgusting nudity.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's nothing "disgusting" about nudity. You should shake off those preconceived cultural biases, you'll be a better person.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago

I don't feel anything abut nudity being posted somewhere and people enjoying it... I just don't want to see it myself because it's disgusting for me)

[–] pathief@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

It's a gigantic money sink, it's going to be extremely hard to come up with a profitable (or break even) alternative.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago

I agree. We just haven't gotten to the point quite yet. Where the creators revolt. But that stage should appear somewhat shortly.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There's platforms like Nebula that noticed the decline and also wanted to give creators the freedom to create without needing to deal with an ever changing algorithm

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’ve considered Nebula a few times. That could absolutely be the alternative I’m looking for if they keep adding creators and topics and variety.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They seemingly are adding more creators. At least the ones I've followed. I recently just started contacting creators to ask if they've even heard of it and willing to contact so ppl can support them that way.

Patreon is cool but I don't want to have a subscription for every creator I like and decide on the amount.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

None of the creators I follow have LiberaPay or crypto as an option either. I don’t want to pay on a proprietary platform.

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for doing the legwork, I appreciate the initiative :) I’m guessing that I’ll end up with a Nebula subscription, I just haven’t pulled the trigger yet.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you want, I can give you a guest pass (one week for free). Just DM me an email address

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the offer, but I’ll support them from day one when I decide to subscribe :) I already know that several creators on Nebula make good content.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I think patreon recently add an option for creators to make a free tier. Which on one hand could work, but on the other - we'd be constantly bombarded with "to see this video upgrade to the $10 or more tier" which would personally bum me out

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP $300

I’m inclined to buy that just because it exists. I hate subscription services so, so much!

This is the best option if you think you’ll use Nebula for more than 5 years.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I'm still on the 30$ plan, 300$ makes more sense when it's 60$/y (which it is now)

[–] hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago

Third party app without an account maybe? Freetube on the desktop and newpipe on the phone is what I like to use. There's stuff like grayjay, tubearchivist, and pinchflat as well. Or just go straight yt-dlp.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Youtube does a ton of evil stuff, but this one is more tame. I suspect the VPN was used to bot and got banned, so the sign-in is required to better target where the traffic is allowed to go, instead of blanket banning everybody using the service.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I suspect the VPN was used to bot

There are plenty of sources, including even in this thread, indicating that that this is not the problem. Quit making excuses for them.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] kbal@fedia.io -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not just you. I'm tired of the whole team of people who are always standing by to bring out similar excuses any time someone decides that in their quest to stop invidious from existing — or whatever google is actually aiming at — it's acceptable to just mass-block all the VPN users as collateral damage.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not an excuse though. It's right there in the error message.

Where are people getting the impression I think google is some kind of saint who can do no wrong? I don't even see the "proof" that is being used to say I'm coming to google's defense. Just a few anecdotal theories... just like I provided.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So what they can bot with VPN without signing in?

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bot can automate views. It's why Youtube keeps trying to move towards "engagement". Comments, likes, etc, all require an account, which is an extra hurdle for bots.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Then I will they just doing half the work. They can just get the site account walled for that goal, not a half patch work of blocking VPN users.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I go the other way. My youtube account is used across my family. My recommendation is a fucking mess.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago

So, the home page includes Peppa pig videos alongside with gruesome skateboarding accident compilations. Something for everyone!

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

My wife and I have our own. We use hers for the kid and mine for the dog. So, hers is beauty gurus and baby shark, and mine is Sarah Boone coverage, old computers, and 10 hour videos of squirrels.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 months ago

You're on Android use NewPipe and it's forks, personally I prefer Tubular and PipePipe.

Periodically YouTube will break, but both of those forks, as well as new pipe prime, update fairly quickly.

GrayJay it's interesting. It has different feel and feature set than newpipe, but it's worth using. I will say I get more login errors with GrayJay, but closing the app and reopening it resolves it.

All the piped apps will be in f-droid/droidify, you can download GrayJay directly, or just scan the QR to add the repo to a FOSS repo manager.