this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
143 points (98.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
798 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is based on 43 states being considered "non-negotiable" and "set in stone" while only 7 are considered "swing" states

Also consider I specified "voters", who are at best only 2/3 of the total population, which leaves out about 100 million extra people

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stolen_Stolen_Valor@hexbear.net 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Every single aspect of voting in this country is a system of hedging bets. It is a tangled mess of yarn, fishing line, cables, and hair. Unfucking a single piece of it wouldn’t fix it, nor is anyone even willing to try. The system cannot correct itself and voting is a useless waste of time. The only way to “Save Democracy” would be to burn it all down and go again.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm told that if we vote and then wish hard enough RCV will manifest and save everything

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Lemmytors are truly insufferable, they come out and speak like the patients from heavy delusions jokes, but are entirely serious. And the worst part is, they are always assume it "will happen" despite all the centuries of it not happening.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"If you don't like the candidates, vote for the person most likely to implement ranked choice voting and then campaign to get it adopted!" ~I\ personally\ am\ fine\ with\ the\ status\ quo\ and\ will\ do\ nothing\ to\ help\ but\ good\ luck\ out\ there\ kiddo.~

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

vote for the person most likely to implement ranked choice voting

So, Claudia de la Cruz?

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

No, silly, she can't win because it has been foreordained as such.