this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
72 points (98.6% liked)
womenby
1405 readers
1 users here now
Community for all women and non-binary people.
Some ground rules:
- Read the Code of Conduct.
- No bigotry of any kind. This includes but is not limited to: Transphobia, Non-Binary Erasure, Sexism, Racism, Ableism, Homophobia etc.
- No Harrassment. This includes but is not limited to: stalking, harassing and threatening posters.
- No Sexually Explicit Content Because of potential doxxing posting sexually explicit content of yourself will be removed.
- Don't Be a Lib No capitalism and imperialism apologia.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My understanding of reproductive labor is limited, but it isn't just birth and childrearing, it's also stuff like housekeeping which enables wage laborers to work. Both expansion and maintenance of labor. Although queer people engage in that sort of thing (we all do to some extent) more than lumpen are economically productive, the reason I made the comparison is numbers. Lumpen are only a small fraction of society and capitalism tends to maintain a constant reserve army of labor, in contrast to the ever-increasing share of proletarians. Artisans would have been a less loaded example, a small class of laborers that doesn't have much power (except that nobody thinks artisans will lead the revolution). My problem is the authors don't really explain why the fraction of queer people might expand until they are doing enough reproductive labor to take the reins. They just handwave "gender's process of decay".