this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
114 points (98.3% liked)

askchapo

22766 readers
375 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Basically a repost pf things I said in the mega, but anecdotally I'm hearing that sales of fiction read by men are dropping precipitously, and English and literature classes in colleges are now dominated by women. It seems like young men are not being exposed to literature in the same way that they used to. Like, when I was in high school and college, you could be a "bro" kind of guy and read Chuck Palahniuk, or Hunter S. Thompson, or David Foster Wallace. For decades, authors like Hemmingway and Bukowski found receptive audiences in young men, not to mention all the crime fiction, horror, sci-fi, and fantasy that men have traditionally consumed. The "guy in your English class who loves David Foster Wallace" was a stereotype for a reason. I read in another thread that music is less culturally important to young men than it used to be. It seems like younger men just straight up see no value in reading literature or fiction, or exposing themselves or critically engaging with art and music, because the algorithms just railroad them into Alpha Gridset world.

Am I wrong about this? Am I being condescending and out of touch, or is this a real thing that's happening, where the whole "male" culture is turning into grindset podcasts and streamers?

Edit: Okay, so the impression I'm getting is that everything is worse but also kind of the same as it ever was, which sounds right.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's unfortunate that that place could call itself Profitable Writing Advice and it'd be just about as correct.

Writing absolute slop, where it's not just bad ideas but bad composition of bad ideas, can be very profitable if it panders enough.

Just look at Ready Player One.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still can't believe that book was not only a bestseller, but also got made into a movie. I get it, not everyone wants to trudge their way through obscure 18th. century literature or avant-garde meta commentary on English academia. But like..."The idea hit me like an anvil on the top of my head." Really? 300 pages of that? Why would you do that to yourself?

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

My chuddiest relative, one that I've ranted about at length here before, holds Goodkind, Card and Heinlein all in very high regard... but Ready Player One is his very favorite book and he was shocked when I had such a strong negative opinion of it.

He has all the pretenses and attempted pomp and circumstance of a "smart" person, up to and including waving around big words and claiming to have "studied philosophy" and all that... but his favorite book ever is the one that says that being the epic bideo bame boy and knowing lots of Gen X white boy trivia made him the winningest winner. pathetic

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay but Heinlein is kinda mid so that tracks lmao

At least your chud reads. My chuddiest chud relatives think reading is for dorks and I'm pretty sure one of them hasn't picked up a book since high school (despite being almost 50).

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My chud primarily got into reading because the Starship Troopers movie's satire completely fucking missed him and he wanted to read the book where the epic space fascism came from.

He liked the book more.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a

from me considering how open the director and cast have been about the movie being satire. These last few years have convinced me you have to be explicitly and vocally anti-fascist in storytelling because these brainlets don't realize when they aren't welcome.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Even many of the people on set missed the point to the point of pissing off Verhoeven. He complained later about how "yay space fascism!" was a common sentiment among many of the actors there.