this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
154 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19237 readers
2539 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ok, so I'm just scrolling through the most recent polls and picking out numbers based on this. I'm just going to grab the most recent numbers from Silver Bulletin. I'll grab the latest, most recent number for a given pollster, Harris & Trump only.

Not red wave: 6

The New York Times/Siena College

Harris/ Trump:

44%/ 49% (but also, I'm not sure whats going on with the repeat entries on this poll...)

InsiderAdvantage

Not in Nate Silvers database, cant find in 538's either, different name?

Emerson College

Harris/ Trump:

50.2%/ 48.6%

Fabrizio, Lee & Associates/GBAO - While Fabrizio is a Red Wave pollster, GBAO is not.

Harris/ Trump:

45%/ 50%

Quinnipiac University

Harris/ Trump:

47%/ 49%

YouGov/Center for Working Class Politics

Harris/ Trump:

51%/ 48%

Just Bad polling: 3

Redfield & Wilton Strategies

Harris/ Trump:

46%/ 48%

Research Co.

Harris/ Trump:

49%/ 45%

Hunt research:

47%/ 47%

OnMessage:

Can't find in either database.

Red Wave (2):

TIPP Insights

Harris/ Trump:

48%/ 49%

McLaughlin

Harris/ Trump:

48%/ 49%

Doing the quick stats...

Not Red Wave Polls:

Mean:
    Harris: 47.44%
    Trump: 48.92%
Standard Deviation:
    Harris: 3.09%
    Trump: 0.73%

Just Bad Polling:

Mean:
    Harris: 47.33%
    Trump: 46.67%
Standard Deviation:
    Harris: 1.53%
    Trump: 1.53%

Red Wave Polls:

Mean:
    Harris: 48.0%
    Trump: 49.0%
Standard Deviation:
    Harris: 0.0%
    Trump: 0.0%

The Red Wave polls and the Not Rave polls are in good agreement. These polls are all with each others MOE, and would fail a t-test.

Harris:

t-statistic: -0.405
p-value: 0.706

Trump:

t-statistic: -0.245
p-value: 0.818

Both p-values are significantly higher than 0.05, indicating that there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of Harris and Trump percentages.

The article is wrong. Unless it meant to say that Times/ Sienna is a "Red Wave" pollster, this an article targeted towards Blue MAGA to give them something they want to hear.

[Fuck, I'm annoyed. I did this for national, not PA.]

Annoyed so I just made a generalized analysis for everystate:

Codeshare link: https://codeshare.io/ONzAZ0

PA results:

No significant differences. 95% confidence intervals in the shaded area.