150
submitted 10 months ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spectre@hexbear.net 13 points 10 months ago

Right. I think we are about in the same place then. We need to see what comes up next.

There are certainly questions we can discuss about the democratic process, and where it may fall short, and it may be necessary to circumvent, but that's probably a topic for another thread.

I think that looking ahead, the country is better off paving a new future rather than restoring a government that's gonna cozy right up to the French again and maintain the status quo. That could backfire. I guess one thought is that even if it backfires and they end up in kind of an Iran situation, the situation is overall good for the global socialist movement since it weakens at least one colonial power, and we can hope that the movement reforms the country again to something "good" at some point in the future.

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

Any long-term solution to Niger's issues has to come from within the people of Niger, of course.

I expect that a status quo change is likely only on a geopolitical scale and that once the excitement of a change in government dies down the military will run into and perpetuate much the same issues.

I only really trust China to be able to invest and trade with the Global South without being exploitative (even if they aren't doing so out of altruism).

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 10 months ago

Could be two or more global powers in one of Niger locks down uranium exports for long enough – or even just racks up the price. Geopolitically, bringing Nigerien uranium into China's orbit at the same time as bringing Afghan lithium into China's orbit is going to have a ripple effect eventually. Hard to predict more than that.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
150 points (97.5% liked)

World News

2121 readers
158 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS