this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
69 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22888 readers
73 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Theres enough racist people that hes a candidate

Thats it, lets stop putting our heads in the sand with 'economic anxiety'

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] miz@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Age of Napoleon Bonus Episode that examines the intertwined origins of capitalism and racism

https://soundcloud.com/user-279595680/bonus-episode

[–] FearsomeJoeandmac@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I mean ive heard all these arguments before saying capitalism is the sole cause of racism, i dont agree with it.

Racism will be here regardless of whether we are in capitalist shithead land or not, i think we have an obligation to speak out against it and organize against it.

[–] StalinStan@hexbear.net 24 points 4 months ago (12 children)

I am saying it. Look at italians. Thye were swartly PoC and in our lifetimes they were upgraded to white because we needed more numbers to opress the other minorities with. Before that it was the Irish. Looks like pretty soon Brazilians will be white too. After them probably some Cubans than eventually all Cubans. The japanese were white for a while because we needed people to opress the Chinese with. They lost it when they stoped being a useful tool.

White is not about race. It is a class under cpaitlaism. So long as there is money to be made we will always racialize new and interesting outgroups.

[–] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

White is not about race. It is a class under cpaitlaism

nah it's race. If you have a rich black in a community full of whites they'll just kill the rich black on the day SHTF

can't imagine being this scatterbrained

[–] StalinStan@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But which came first. Is he other because he is black? Or is he black because he us other. Compare a melungion person to a light skinned black person. In that situation race has almost nothing to do with race and everything to do with ses.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago (12 children)

No one is saying capitalism is the sole cause of racism, that's completely ahistorical. But what is historical fact is the capitalism greatly exacerbates existing racisms.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

capitalism is the primary cause and engine of racism. Racialism was invented in the 17th century alongside the mercantile transition into capitalism. Capitalism and Racism were born together and will die together, they are twins.

[–] FearsomeJoeandmac@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is class reductionism right here. Racism was around long before the 17th century lmfao.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No it was not, the concept of race was invented around this time. Perhaps you mean prejudice and ethnic sectarianism? That certainly existed. Race did not. Might behoove you to do some reading on this subject before pontificating with false confidence

[–] FearsomeJoeandmac@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lol, now you are just arguing semantics.

The celts were considered a race apart from the anglo saxons.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 19 points 4 months ago

The “race” part is essential to “racism”. This is not semantics this is purely the meat of the discussion

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

This only makes sense if you define "racism" exclusively as "white supremacism". But you're not saying much at that point. You're just saying racism as we currently experience it is a product of capitalism. Which, duh, everything is.

Racism existed before capitalism and can exist after. Examples: the Caste System, the Khmer Rouge. Shit even Christopher Columbus was about as racist as you can get and that's right before capitalism kicks off. The Racialism you're describing is just the ideological petina that capitalists put on their pre-existing racism.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago (6 children)

No I define racism as prejudice based of the system of racialism, which was invented in the 17th century.

Other forms of sectarian prejudice existed beforehand. Not racism

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the system of racialism, which was invented in the 17th century.

And that's somehow not White Supremacism?

Other forms of sectarian prejudice existed beforehand. Not racism

bruh-moment

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not my fault you don’t know the historical literature and are redefining clearly defined words

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Its not racism without race science" is meaningless pedantry. If we accept your definitions then the broader topic of "sectarian prejudice" is the greater issue than your narrow definition to the current flavor of "sectarian prejudice". Your prioritizing dealing with racism as an ideology and not dealing with its material causes.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago (4 children)

"It's not racism without race" is what you meant. Literally no concept of the ideas of "races" until this time. There cannot be prejudice along lines which are not yet drawn. This isn't needless pedantry, this is fundamental to understanding what racism is and how to address it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FearsomeJoeandmac@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The anglo saxons had apartheid laws against the celts in 6th century britain.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago

Sectarian and ethnic strife are nothing new. The concept of “races” is the secret sauce that makes racism racism

[–] StalinStan@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago (10 children)

I am. Race isn't real. It is an artificial construction we shape to whatever we please. There is no connectivity tissue to it. If capitlaism didn't enforce it it would wither and die on the vine.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes race is totally artificial, and capitalism has invented an intense apparatus to justify it. But the belief in it and the economic forces that drive that belief will exist as long as there is inequality and scarcity. Communism would eliminate that but there are other systems than communism and capitalism. They just wouldn't be all pseudo scientific about it like the capitalists would.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (9 children)

capitalism has invented an intense apparatus to justify it

You have the causality backwards. Capitalism doesn't invent things to justify racism, racism is invented to justify Capitalism. Capitalism required slavery, so it required an ideology that made it OK for certain people to become slaves. The racism was post hoc justification for what Capitalism already intended to do.

Europeans didn't go "look at these black Africans, I hate them so much I might as well enslave them" and then stumble accidentally into capitalism. They realized they required cheap start-up labor for the primitive accumulation of fixed capital and went out looking for it.

[–] StalinStan@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

I am slightly upset you said it way better than I could.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)