this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
670 points (98.7% liked)

RetroGaming

19383 readers
983 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 35 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

As someone who lived through that era, let me tell you, the gameplay graphics were never a disappointment. In your mind they looked as good as graphics today. The only thing I can remember being disappointed about was the Nintendo Powerglove. Man, what a collosal, non-working, over hyped advertising lies, piece of shit that thing was!

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Mario 3 was the most mind blowing leap in graphics I think I've ever experienced.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

The game in the example is Bad Street Brawler which is every bit as terrible as portrayed. I have it somewhere still. Could never get past like thr second level.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 hours ago

Nah there were definitely games that had disappointing graphics relative to what I was expecting lol

Although it's true, we generally were more forgiving about graphics back then than we are these days.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The Wizard lied to me for 2 hours about that useless piece of plastic.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 10 hours ago

Dude, the guy who introduced it in the movie straight up said "it's so bad!"

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

But if you would have saved it until today you could resell it foe a whole $25 more (of course accounting for inflation it’s actually $105 less)

Wait is that true? Did a rare Nintendo product depreciate in value????

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 hours ago

It was a mattel product

[–] aciDC14@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I’m gonna press X to doubt on that one.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

No, he’s right. The power glove was garbage from the get-go. Really cool cyberpunk thing on paper but … hell, we still aren’t there today!

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We absolutely could be "there" today but the lingering aura of the Powerglove is still so powerful that nobody has tried to make a better one. It got clowned on so hard the first time that the echoes of that are still rippling through our global subconscious 35 years later.

Also, Nintendo would probably try to sue you if you sold a glove-based controller, even 35 years later.

[–] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

I'd argue that haptic gloves, valve index controllers, and hand tracking are there, but the hardware for VR isn't quite cheap enough for it to be mainstream.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip -2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Even if it worked well, the idea was bad from the start. No one wants to control a game with motion controls.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I dunno, Wii seemed to manage it just fine.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

No X button on the controller. Just A and B.