this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
1528 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

5268 readers
2013 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 142 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Divorce rate may be too low.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 57 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's that the marriage rate has been too high for a long time.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 32 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That, and people become economicly dependent. They tried UBI when Nixon was president (I know right) and it was considered a failure because the divorce rate went up. What later studies showed was that the divorce rate went up because women in abusive or dead end relationships were finally empowered to leave the spouses they had become depend on.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Successful experiment for them. Prove economic suppression was working to keep women abused carrying babies. Checked clipboard, doubled down.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

And if women voted as often as they should this wouldn't be considered a political failure

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 48 points 3 weeks ago

Might be a good idea to divorce now before the conservative supreme court screws up that option too.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's that large parts of the country are an absolute dystopia, all the jobs are either physically demanding, or service-related.

[–] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

why is that related to divorce rates?

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Women can't get the high paying jobs traditionally performed by men, making them financially dependent.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't forget the abortion angle, combined with the healthcare and housing angles. Add in the poor public education angle and you've got a vicious cycle creating dependence on men and new generations of people with fewer resources to avoid getting caught in that cycle themselves.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Also just the assumption of gender roles where women are expected to still be stay at home moms while mem are expected to provide, which is far more entrenched in the south, it's actually a religious commandment to them.