this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22766 readers
440 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The wiki page on the ascent is kind of hilarious with how it makes the scepticism seem completely racially motivated:

  • Subsequent ascents corroborated the expedition report's descriptions of the Third Step and the terrain near the summit, and demonstrated the viability of ascending without oxygen
  • Lawrence Wager concluded that the 25 May photos were taken above the Second Step by comparing them to photos from the 1933 and 1953 expeditions
  • contemporary written accounts from the 1960 expedition "incorporate descriptions of topographical details of the final pyramid that could only have been obtained if the party had indeed reached the top."
  • A study of the video determined that it had been taken above 8,700 m, demonstrating that the party had overcome the crux of the way to the summit

vs

"there was a cliff they said was 3m tall but actually it's 8m tall"

[โ€“] newacctidk@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago

Yeah it is funny when wikipedia tells on these assholes. Suddenly they don't like it as an aggregate