this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
120 points (100.0% liked)

news

23560 readers
640 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 38 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Wow, this presidency might actually be the next phase. I predict that he will attempt to convince Congress to remove term limits from the presidency.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 68 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What would even be the point, the man is term limited by life

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I used to think the funniest outcome would be that Trump wins 2024 and then dies before he takes office.

But this raises a new, even funnier idea: Trump wins 2028 and then dies before he starts his third term.

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Trump will start WWIII (put unacceptable sanctions on China, causing China to retaliate). And since war is so presidential, and really that would not be the time to change presidents, Democrats and Republicans decide its fine if he runs again.

:fdr-shining:

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I think the most unrealistic part of this is that China retaliates with military force to sanctions. The rest is much more believable lol

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I was just trying to mirror what Japan did in response to US provocations.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 1 points 13 hours ago

I wasn't criticizing you or your joke or something, your joke was funny. Just wanted to highlight how funny it is that the only unrealistic part was China's response. The rest is sadly believable.

[–] Feline@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Exactly. Pretty sure China's plan is either cooperate and build prosperity together, or... sit-back-and-enjoy

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thing is US is broke. China has a US sized population which they are signing deal after deal with in Indonesia. We're becoming irrelevant. Which is smart for China.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

The US is in debt at the federal level, but it still represents one of the largest markets because of how much spending power is held by the middle class, relative to other nations. It’s on the decline but it still isn’t at the point where China can just shrug off the US.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The silliest point would be to die of old age and have Vance take over, now without limits. But the broader point would be setting the conditions for a future evolution of the program.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ah yes, King Vance. That's not unsettling at all /s.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

The Vance Macabre

[–] miz@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

have you ever Vanced with the devil in the pale moonlight?

[–] kittin@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago
[–] miz@hexbear.net 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

who cares, it's not a democracy anyway

[–] Cummunism@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

they would have to amend the constitution, which requires two thirds of Congress to even propose it, and three fourths of the states to ratify it. So that's pretty unlikely.

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

or just have the Supreme Court reinterpret that part of the constitution.

[–] Feline@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Staying president is an official act think-about-it

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 3 points 21 hours ago

trump-enlightened "When I was sworn in for the third time, I was speaking ex cathedra" mccrucified

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago

“Congress had less people in it then, so judging by the original intent it actually should only be two thirds of the congress as it existed back then.” See? I can be a SCOTUS justice too!

[–] Cummunism@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i guess in this case congress could pass a law saying no more term limits, seems like that would be a pretty quick SCOTUS case, but i guess all the conservative judges COULD say it's ok.

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well, Trump would run again. Then he'd either get blocked from ballots, they would sue, and the supreme court would say he's allowed to. Or he would win the election, someone would bring a case arguing that it's unconstitutional for him to take office, and the supreme court would disagree.

And the way those lawsuits often work is the person gets to keep doing the thing of questionable legality. So he could probably still get on ballots and run, even if there's a lawsuit.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

term limits

I predict Trump will succeed. Trump has to get through SCOTUS too. But what I think is funny is that the GOP SCOTUS justices turned Trump into Godzilla without even something limiting like control collar. How can you say "no" to Godzilla? He does whatever he wants. The GOP justices gave Trump the powers of a king. Criminal law doesn't apply to him. He can imprison, torture, or kill anybody. Even members of congress and their families or the justices themselves or their families.

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump could just keep killing members of congress until the next one votes as he wants them to. I’d estimate about two or three dead predecessors before the next one gets the message.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

Killing might not even be needed. Just a few minutes of waterboarding - with threats of doing it to their families - and any of them will be 100% broken and they'll do whatever he wants them to do.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Attempt? You act as though they'll provide any pushback

[–] Cummunism@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Democrats are stupid, but "let him remove term limits" stupid? Doubt.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

They're not stupid enough to get themselves killed over denying Trump the opportunity to be emperor

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

unless he starts WWIII and it would hurt the sense of unity to not let Trump run again.

[–] Lemmykoopa@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 day ago

This would benefit dems longterm. Shit gets worse domestically marginally faster under republicans and they struggle to get reelected as a result. People meanwhile really really would have voted for Obama a third time and he'd definitely be on his way to his fifth term rn