this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
130 points (97.8% liked)

Spaceflight

631 readers
273 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The transfer tunnel, known by the Russian acronym PrK, connects the Zvezda module with a docking port where Soyuz crew and Progress resupply spacecraft attach to the station.

Air has been leaking from the transfer tunnel since September 2019. On several occasions, Russian cosmonauts have repaired the cracks and temporarily reduced the leak rate. In February, the leak rate jumped up again to 2.4 pounds per day, then increased to 3.7 pounds per day in April.

"The Russian position is that the most probable cause of the PrK cracks is high cyclic fatigue caused by micro-vibrations," Cabana said on November 13. "NASA believes the PrK cracks are likely multi-causal, including pressure and mechanical stress, residual stress, material properties, and environmental exposures."

Crew members aboard the space station are keeping the hatch leading to the PrK closed when they don't need to access the Progress cargo freighter docked at the other end of the transfer tunnel. Russian cosmonauts must open the hatch to unpack supplies from the Progress or load trash into the ship for disposal.

As a precaution, Barratt said space station crews are also closing the hatch separating the US and Russian sections of the space station when cosmonauts are working in the PrK.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Because it’s a slapped-together mess of duct tape and hope?

The ISS is old. It was never meant to last past 2013. At this point, minor malfunctions, like this are expected.

The ISS needs to be replaced with a larger orbital research platform.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

No it needs to be expanded so that it can house thousands of different species.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The ISS is modular

It needs a new module. Undo the tinker toys and put them back together.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Undo the tinker toys

Cold welding has entered the chat. The ISS might not be modular... any more.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The question is how much would it cost to build such? I believe the International Space Station itself cost like $100 billion to build, which is a lot of money. Now, maybe Space Station construction costs have dropped in the like 20 years, or something like that, since then.

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

$100 billion sounds a lot, but in comparison it's miniscule. For that amount of money you can either run an international space station for 24 years or the US military for 1.3 months, or the russian military for one year. If we'd just start killing eachother a little less, we could easily save that much money.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago

I am all for killing less people and funding space stations. That's for sure.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I would assume inflation made the number bigger today even if costs have dropped.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Well, apparently it cost a hundred billion to actually build the thing and that was in like dollars in 2000. So you'd have to hope that space station development went down faster than inflation went up. And if so, it might actually cost a little bit less to build it today.