this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
452 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59498 readers
3052 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal 112 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (6 children)

I mean, some of those EOLed nearly a decade ago.

You can argue over what a reasonable EOL is, but all hardware is going to EOL at some point, and at that point, it isn't going to keep getting updates.

Throw enough money at a vendor, and I'm sure that you can get extended support contracts that will keep it going for however long people are willing to keep chucking money at a vendor -- some businesses pay for support on truly ancient hardware -- but this is a consumer broadband router. It's unlikely to make a lot of sense to do so on this -- the hardware isn't worth much, nor is it going to be terribly expensive to replace, and especially if you're using the wireless functionality, you probably want support for newer WiFi standards anyway that updated hardware will bring.

I do think that there's maybe a good argument that EOLing hardware should be handled in a better way. Like, maybe hardware should ship with an EOL sticker, so that someone can glance at hardware and see if it's "expired". Or maybe network hardware should have some sort of way of reporting EOL in response to a network query, so that someone can audit a network for EOLed hardware.

But EOLing hardware is gonna happen.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 4 points 3 hours ago

EoL of anything should mean open source code. You don't want to open source your code? Then you must keep servicing your products and must keep your servers up

[–] viking@infosec.pub 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The ones with EOL 2015, fair play. But May 2024 isn't all that long ago.

Edit: Looks like those were launched in early 2015. I guess requesting users to update devices after 8+ years might not be too far fetched.

Source: https://www.dlink.com/rs/sr/press-centre/press-releases/2015/february/04/unified_services_router_dsr_150n

[–] db2@lemmy.world 66 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

all hardware is going to EOL at some point, and at that point, it isn't going to keep getting updates

EOLing hardware should be handled in a better way

Both of these are solved by one thing: open platforms. If I can flash OpenWRT on to an older router then it becomes useful again.

[–] Rivalarrival 38 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Bingo.

Either support the device until the heat death of the universe, or provide consumers with the access to maintain it themselves.

[–] Damn990099@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But neither of those help corporations make them all the money. So we need regulation to force them to.

[–] Rivalarrival 7 points 7 hours ago

Regulation? I think you mean "guillotines"...

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Definitely don’t this in the past (Linksys WRT54G!) but let’s be honest, the kind of people running 10yo Dlink routers aren’t going to flash new firmware, let alone OpenWRT or even know to look for it. It would have to come that way from the factory. And even then I doubt most people even do regular updates, sadly.

[–] shininghero@pawb.social 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think there should be a handoff procedure, or whatever you want to call it.

As EOL approaches, work with whatever open router OS maker is available (currently OpenWRT) to make sure it's supported, and configs migrate over nicely. Then drop one last update, designed to do a full OS replacement.

Boom, handoff complete.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

I’d support a regulation that defines either an expiration date or commitment to open source at the time the hardware is sold.

[–] YaksDC@sh.itjust.works 36 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This is the correct reaction to old home equipment.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 12 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Right?

Something this old is going to be power inefficient compared to newer stuff, and simply not perform as well.

I would know, I just booted up a 10 year old consumer router last night, because the current one died. It'll be OK for a few days until I can get a replacement. Boy, is this thing slow.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 5 points 14 hours ago

My cat likes how much heat they make too.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 16 hours ago

I have a netgear router that isn't even that old and it doesn't have gigabit ports.

even though I was able to throw openwrt on there to mess around with it's still e-waste

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

When the users are in control of the software running on their devices then "EOL" is dependent the user community's willingness to work on it themselves.