this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
578 points (94.1% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3790 readers
614 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 45 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I just couldn't get into Discovery or Picard because they felt... weird? Not that it wasn't like Star Trek in the stories or that it was "woke," but it just didn't have the same vibe as what I grew up with. Lower Decks has the vibe, but not the tone or anything else. I need to check out Strange New Worlds. It looks like it might be what I'm really missing.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Both Picard and Discovery were season long plots without episodic filler episodes to shake things up which made it painfully obvious that their overarching plotlines were terrible. Add some poorly done melodramatic scenes about how the leads are the most important people ever without showing why (and in a lot of cases showing the opposite) and we have two series that were just a slog to watch up to the point that I stopped.

Both sounded good on paper. Both had great casts. Both seemed to suffer from terrible writing and direction.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The final season of PIC was fun, and the second one had some good moments, mostly with Q. But that first season was still being written as they were filming and the second season had part of its budget appropriated for the third season and it shows in both.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

But that first season was still being written as they were filming

Really? That explains a lot.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

without episodic filler episodes to shake things up which made it painfully obvious that their overarching plotlines were terrible

The other series are episode-based with some random simple overarching plotlines thrown at them so they don't feel repetitive. Yes, those plotlines can't sustain a series, but that was never the goal.

I can't talk about Picard, but Discovery has a series of really interesting ideas that were completely destroyed by the overwhelmingly bad details. The plots are not exactly terrible, they have some more complex issues, and the insistence on emotional solutions to galaxy-wide physical problems is a recurring issue there (to the point that in season 4, where a "My Little Pony" plotline makes sense, it feels empty and repetitive).

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

I can’t talk about Picard, but Discovery has a series of really interesting ideas that were completely destroyed by the overwhelmingly bad details.

This is it. Both series had season plots that would have made for generally decent two-parters back in the '90s.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I just watched Season 2 of Picard and all I could think the whole time was "TNG crew would have wrapped this up in 1 or 2 episodes..."

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

Yup, in order to make Discovery and Picard work, the writers had to give everyone the idiot ball.

Trek is at its best when it's competence porn.

As a note, to be in star fleet requires 4 years at the start fleet academy. You need to be somewhat good at your job and somewhat disciplined to even be considered for a slot on a ship.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not a fan of Picard Season 2 but I will give it the argument that it only takes place over the course of like 2-3 days, just like most TNG episodes when you factor in warp speeds and all the time delays that are needed for the things talked about in the episodes.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah I know. It just felt like it dragged on. I guess I just prefer more episodic Star Trek. Probably in general... all these 8 episode per season "prestige" shows are getting tiresome.

[–] USSMojave@startrek.website 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yes, watch Strange New Worlds! It really does get at the vibe and tone of TNG and the other 90s Trek shows. It's a breath of fresh air

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Second watching SNW! Really fantastic show.

I disagree that it recaptures the vibe and tone of TNG/'90s Trek. I'd say it's much more like TOS with weird (in a good way) plots and swashbuckling adventure. '90s Trek felt much more grounded and more taking-itself-seriously than TOS or SNW.

[–] USSMojave@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I agree it doesn't exactly capture the vibe and tone of the 90s show, rather it "gets at" them since it's a lot closer than other nutrek productions. Visually though it gives Star Trek 2009, which is a fun bit of continuity

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

I've heard good things about that enough that I had already decided to watch it in abstract, but you have just tipped me over the edge and I've decided to actually give it a try. Thanks for the push, I will think of you when I do watch it

[–] ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

SNW is TOS and TNG modernised. Some character arcs span across some episodes but the episodes by themselves are self contained (maybe with the exception of the end of the seasons).

There is room for totally random episodes that can experiment, do crazy things, and most important, expand characters.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I bounced off Picard because the only thing I liked about it was Jeri Ryan.

I liked the whole alt-dimension humans are evil shit in Discovery, but everyone is so fucking weepy the whole time. It's depressing. I don't think it helps that everything seems to be filmed in tiny green screen box sets so everyone has to stand still or they run out of room.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure where you're getting the green screen box thing for Discovery. They didn't use a whole lot of green screen. They built fairly massive sets that were all reused for other shows. The screens that you see in the show as well, like the see through ones and the ones in the consoles, are not added in post. They mass bought those screens and they actually function in real life. Honestly the amount of CGI used in Discovery, at least outside of space based stuff and effects like transporters/phasers/progammable matter is pretty low. Even then the green screens that they did use were replaced by the video wall for Season 4 and 5.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've no idea why it all looks so cheap then.

I honestly thought David Cronenberg had died and they'd had to use a CGI version of him.

Everything just look so... off...

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I've heard so many complaints about Discovery over the years. Hundreds.

Cheap is a new one.

[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 2 points 2 days ago

They both had dogshit writing. Deeply bad. Criminally stupid.