this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
712 points (96.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9807 readers
21 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

BTW the tank has a better forward view than the truck

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedIce25@lemmy.world 52 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

I can't understand why someone would want that large of a car

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 74 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)

It’s not even good for truck stuff. All that lift kit is extra weight and puts the bed too high to load stuff into it without a crane.

It’s also really expensive so you’re not gonna fuck it up when off-roading, though those wheels and tires aren’t off-road ready.

ETA: It's not even artistic. A low rider isn't good for anything but they look great. Sometimes art can be a reason. But this is just a giant, ugly, beige piece of crap with hideous wheels.

It’s an entirely useless vehicle that isn’t good for anything and I hate it.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s also really expensive

This is the reason. Conspicuous consumption is a pox on us all.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Conspicuous consumption has been a thing for a really, really long time. But at least in previous time periods the things they were consuming at least were interesting to look at. Now it's just mass-produced bullshit that doesn't even look good. For fuck's sake: They're selling stained and ripped jeans for hundreds of dollars!

Bring back codpieces and fancy frilled collars! Bring back ornate brocade and gold detailing! Bring back ornate architecture! If you're going to exploit us for our labor at least make things that look good!

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

Not to mention the borderline useless low profile tires. The bead would probably slip off the rim on a bumpy cottage road, i can't even imagine how poorly they'd perform in real offroad conditions.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

lift kit = extra weight, bed too high

The weight added by a lift kit is a rounding error on the weight of the vehicle
Beds are too high from the factory so this doesnt actually matter

Offroading

This style is not built to go offroading

Not artisitic

Not up to you. People are allowed to like things.

Get better, defendable arguments.

These trucks suck to drive, ride like shit, get poor fuel economy, pollute the planet (especially after emissions equipment is deleted), but most importantly are unsafe to be on the road: they barely fit in the lanes, the view out of them is abysmal, and are extremely heavy which makes them unsafe in a collision.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The reason is "mine is bigger than yours", almost entirely.

And expense, but the size and power numbers are most of what these people care about, like it makes them better than other people in smaller cars in their mind.

I'm pretty sure a lot of them think everyone driving something smaller is jealous and if they say they aren't jealous they're just lying to cover up that they can't be as awesome as big truck drivers

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They're like the Ood except they've just got their egos on the outside

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This is not where I was expecting Doctor Who references, but I like it

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

It's good for making the owner forget they have a micropenis for a short while.

[–] homoludens@feddit.org 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Could we stop using "micropenis" and the likes as insults? There are many men with small dicks who aren't insecure assholes.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Agreed. Moving away from body shaming, here are a couple of names for such a huge vehicle: Pavement Princess, Emotional Support Vehicle.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago

Pavement Princess is my go-to

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 18 points 4 weeks ago

I know right?

The tank is obviously better for the commuter.

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Right? If I'm going to get a vehicle that big it better have a 120mm cannon at least.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 4 weeks ago

And come up to traffic ahead? What traffic? You just keep going!

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

Insecure little boys generally

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

society has made us see cars more as a statement of one's image rather than an object of utility.

this is also why luxury brands thrive in general -- because there exist people with more money than sense.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 1 points 4 weeks ago

Otherwise it wouldn’t fit the owner’s inflated ego.