this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
58 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1480 readers
181 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
58
Godot Isn't Making it - (What if AI has already peaked?) (www.wheresyoured.at)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/techtakes@awful.systems
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

New Ed! Not much particularly new info, just a general lament and summary of the state of tech and how much has been pinned on magical thinking. Has some wonderfully quotable sections.

What if what we're seeing today isn't a glimpse of the future, but the new terms of the present? What if artificial intelligence isn't actually capable of doing much more than what we're seeing today, and what if there's no clear timeline when it'll be able to do more? What if this entire hype cycle has been built, goosed by a compliant media ready and willing to take career-embellishers at their word?

Please forgive my addition to the title, as it's meant to be a play on "Waiting for Godot", not a comment on the Godot game engine. Wanted to make that more clear than the title alone would.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

It's a poorly chosen title, especially in tech, where godot is overwhelmingly understood to be a game engine.

Waiting for Godot is a play by Irish playwright Samuel Beckett in which two characters, Vladimir (Didi) and Estragon (Gogo), engage in a variety of discussions and encounters while awaiting the titular Godot, who never arrives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waiting_for_Godot

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 17 points 2 weeks ago

Well maybe tech should stop taking over perfectly good words grumble grumble.

Well half joking; there are much worse culprits than Godot (looking at you Apple) and something like "Still Waiting For Godot" may have made the reference easier to get.

[–] jaschop@awful.systems 16 points 2 weeks ago

"In popular culture" section coming in clutch per usual:

The two Argentine developers, Jaun Linietsky & Ariel Manzur, were repeatedly tasked with updating the engine from a period of time from 2001 to 2014, and chose the name "Godot" due to its relation to the play, as it represents the never-ending wish of adding new features in the engine, which would get it closer to an exhaustive product, but would never actually be completed.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

Came here to say something like that. Made me raise my eyebrow on why Ed might be talking about the best game engine.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Ed is presuming a high school education from his readers, where kids get hammered with the play whether or not they have any idea what it is

out in the world, ~nobody has heard of the game engine

[–] jonhendry@iosdev.space 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

@dgerard @TunaCowboy

I assumed it was an AI company I hadn’t heard of. But the play was my next guess. I have not seen or read the play. I do know that Gandalf and Picard were in a production.

[–] khalid_salad@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

in my texas high school we read atlash shrugged^1^ and the davinci code

1: don't tell my teacher but i sparknotes'd this one

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Throwback Thursday: Atlas Shrugged: The Cobra Commander Dialogues

(Based on blog posts now available here.)

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago

Ed is presuming a high school education from his readers

Hmm, I don't think ignoring the American audience like that is a good idea, but maybe he has his reasons

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Or a secret, third option: